Article Stating That 70% Isopropyl Alcohol is a Better Disinfectant than 99%

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

3 Fresh Askwith Pipes
9 Fresh Radice Pipes
2 Fresh Kent Rasmussen Pipes
3 Fresh Bill Shalosky Pipes
New Cigars

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

mso489

Lifer
Feb 21, 2013
41,210
60,454
Removing the crud that carry the bugs is one key, so water, dish detergent, and perhaps alcohol at some concentration, plus physical friction might all help. Additional studies might add more information ... but that's what all scientists say.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bnichols23
Mar 1, 2014
3,647
4,916
A hot water flush achieves the same level of bacteria removal, as well as being cheaper and more convenient than alcohol, which use may impact the briar itself.

And soggy dottle? Any dottle should be removed fairly soon, but if you dry your tobacco, you won't have a soggy bottom. I gore-an-tee it.

Think about what doctors do to ensure they don’t contaminate a sterile environment. A hot water flush will encourage bacterial growth as much as anything, unless you’re actually going to boil your pipe for ten minutes.
At this point I Just have to lament how sad western society can be sometimes.
Alcohol shouldn’t be expensive at all. We can burn Ethanol for mass transportation but heaven forbid the common person have any other use for it.
 

bnichols23

Lifer
Mar 13, 2018
4,131
9,554
SC Piedmont
Those of restoring estate pipes may find this information interesting. I'm not posting this to as an argument that 70% is the "correct" way or that using 91%+ is "wrong." I'm not a scientist or in a relevant field and cannot competently comment on the findings in the article, so I simply present it as something of interest. There is also some information about rubbing and denatured alcohol.

Why Is 70% Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) a Better Disinfectant than 99% Isopropanol, and What Is IPA Used For? - https://blog.gotopac.com/2017/05/15/why-is-70-isopropyl-alcohol-ipa-a-better-disinfectant-than-99-isopropanol-and-what-is-ipa-used-for/

Interesting extracts:

The presence of water is a crucial factor in destroying or inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microorganisms with isopropyl alcohol. Water acts as a catalyst and plays a key role in denaturing the proteins of vegetative cell membranes. 70% IPA solutions penetrate the cell wall more completely which permeates the entire cell, coagulates all proteins, and therefore the microorganism dies.

Solutions > 91% IPA may kill some bacteria, but require longer contact times for disinfection, and enable spores to lie in a dormant state without being killed. A 50% isopropyl alcohol solution kills Staphylococcus Aureus in less than 10 seconds (pg. 238), yet a 90% solution with a contact time of over two hours is ineffective.

Interesting -- didn't know that!

Bill
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpmcwjr and Bowie

peregrinus

Lifer
Aug 4, 2019
1,205
3,787
Pacific Northwest
Not advocating this, but this thread brings to mind the classic George Carlin routine on germs and the immune system. If you can take a few “F” bombs and bathroom humor goggle:
“George Carlin germs” to see the full 6 minutes. I’d post a link but I am pretty sure it is not for general audiences.

Carlin’s approach:
“When I was a little boy in New York City in the 1940s, we swam in the Hudson River, and it was filled with raw sewage. OK? We swam in raw sewage - you know, to cool off. And at that time, the big fear was polio. Thousands of kids died from polio every year. But you know something? In my neighborhood, no one ever got polio. No one. Ever. You know why? 'Cause we swam in raw sewage.”
YMMV
 

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
15,777
29,582
45
In the semi-rural NorthEastern USA
Not advocating this, but this thread brings to mind the classic George Carlin routine on germs and the immune system. If you can take a few “F” bombs and bathroom humor goggle:
“George Carlin germs” to see the full 6 minutes. I’d post a link but I am pretty sure it is not for general audiences.

Carlin’s approach:


YMMV
not sure he's right about that. Not quite how the immune system works, though swimming in raw sewage might reduce contact with other children, and that might work.
 

allosh

Lurker
Nov 24, 2012
22
22
I am dealing with estate pipes and the concern is about previous smokers and the issue of God knows what I could be exposed to.
I soak stems in Oxyclean and then pipe cleaners in vodka. (Can’t get Everclear is BC) if the bowl is bad I use the salt treatment but I don’t believe this is a disinfectant as much as an oil,gunk remover. The bowl gets a heavy vodka pipe cleaner treatment.
I don’t know if disease organisms survive in old tar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bowie

mso489

Lifer
Feb 21, 2013
41,210
60,454
I'd be interested to hear chemists discuss the 70% versus 90% difference in cleaning or sterilizing properties. Some chemical reactions and interaction are counter-intuitive, and it isn't always "more is better." And sometimes the reason for that is fairly simple to understand. In my case, simple to understand is good. It would be interesting to hear the discussion. Any chemists want to weigh in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bowie and jpmcwjr

scloyd

Lifer
May 23, 2018
5,948
12,064
I amazed that some of you guys find the courage to put a pipe in your mouth with all the concerns and phobias over germs and stuff.
I'm still a newbie (18 months) and it was about a year before I would even consider smoking an estate pipe. Now, I have a couple that I smoke.

And yes, I frequent bars/restaurants and use silverware, glasses and cups. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bowie and jpmcwjr

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,151
12,251
I'm a scientist. A very very dirty 50s Charatan consumed all of my alcohol while cleaning yesterday. I made a point to stock up on my pipe cleaning supplies in lab today. A half-liter of pure methanol and a half-liter of isopropanol, each pure 100%.

A chemist will tell you, strictly speaking, that cleaning a pipe is a question of the appropriate solvents. It's all 'chromatography' in a sense, i.e. the leaching of various materials in the appropriate solvent. Tars and gunk (generically speaking) are materials of various molecular weights and solubilities and they leach out to varying degrees in the appropriate solvents.

Smoking from a properly-dried pipe that was cleaned with isopropanol (rubbing alcohol) or methanol (wood alcohol) is less dangerous, and represents less exposure than cleaning a wound with an alcohol (isopropanol) wipe or touching wood alcohol while finishing up a countertop after sanding.

I mentioned earlier: gunk and germs are two different things. I think most of us are cleaning pipes. Nobody I know has ever caught a disease from a pipe, or even a toilet seat for that matter. Nevertheless, appropriately cleaning a pipe will almost entirely sanitize that pipe.

I'll close by saying that alcohols are safe for cleaning pipes, and disinfecting them if you're in need of that particular reassurance, however you should be sure that they are properly dried after a few hours, and you should be absolutely sure if you use Ethanol that it does NOT contain the bittering agent denatonium (read the ingredients; if in doubt, don't use). Furthermore these following solvents are not recommended: acetone (unless you're completely stripping your briar; it may damage your stem and remove any paint thereon), chloroform, heptane, hexane, pentane, toluene, or xylene. Pure chemicals marked 1-Propanol and 2-Propanol are acceptable, and in fact 2-Propanol is iso-Propanol. Obviously do not use kerosene or gasoline.

9555
 

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,151
12,251
I'd be interested to hear chemists discuss the 70% versus 90% difference in cleaning or sterilizing properties. Some chemical reactions and interaction are counter-intuitive, and it isn't always "more is better." And sometimes the reason for that is fairly simple to understand. In my case, simple to understand is good. It would be interesting to hear the discussion. Any chemists want to weigh in?
The answer is that 90% (or 100%) is better for physical-chemical cleaning (if what you're cleaning is "tars"; if it's something water soluble then water is what will clean it); the reason that 70% alcohol is a better disinfectant is that alcohol isn't water, it's actually a "short fat" (properly said, an aliphatic compound). Although alcohol is water-soluble, it isn't itself similar to water, and so it isn't particularly efficient at entering cells (the cells of germs) like water is, and when it's pure it has many non-water properties. When alcohols are combined with water, hydrogen bonding between the alcohol and the water disrupt these intrinsic qualities of the alcohol and allow it to pass more efficiently into cells.
 

jpmcwjr

Moderator
Staff member
May 12, 2015
24,702
27,293
Carmel Valley, CA
Thanks for the explanations above.

There's no need to use alcohol at all for 90% of all pipe cleaning jobs. And there's a reason to avoid it altogether: It leaches out some of the minerals that give briar its very properties of strength and fire resistance.

As to virii and bacteria, they will die on any surface within a few days, so best not light up an estate pipe right away. If it's your own germs, so what?
 

diamondback

Lifer
Feb 22, 2019
1,215
1,932
54
Rockvale, TN
As much as I can. As a matter of fact, I have what I call a Pilate Complex: I wash my hands dozens of times a day.

Oh! That explains your cob cleaning (that other thread). As someone with genuine OCD (I’m a ‘checking’ model), I understand.

My most sincere apologies, Olkofri! I was genuinely “taking the pi$$,” (joking) but now I realize I might have been quite offensive.

/cheers
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpmcwjr
Status
Not open for further replies.