Are you going to post the updates in this thread or start a new one?
Also was going to ask this too. Which thread am I following? LolAre you going to post the updates in this thread or start a new one?
A warm water flush would have taken care of the taste. But I've been under the impression that cake equals no color. That's the only reason I scrape my meer bowls.So your theory is that because the cake softens/"opens" when getting hot more tar/nicotine/chemicals settles into the cake, the cake cools down and "closes" again, but those chemicals are still in the cake and have a longer effect on the material? Sounds plausible to me. Interesting experiment!
The cake might have a maximum on how much residue it can absorb and that's why Didimauws one tasted rancid. I think you'll run into a risk when the cake "opens" and there is to many residue it might seep into the tobacco your smoking at that moment and make it taste funny...
Well, meers were treated with spermaceti back then not just beeswax. So yes they were made differently.Tobacco back then couldn't be much different from what it is now? Either they smoked their pipes a lot more, or they made the pipes differently, or they were precolored in some way. I don't know what else to think about it.
I went ahead and started a new thread, so this one can be used as originally intended.Also was going to ask this too. Which thread am I following? Lol
Damn good point....Followingsubscribed!![]()
I may make notes of it in the WAYS thread.Are you going to post the updates in this thread or start a new one?
And dealing with the pipe for a while. I think the issue with cake in a meer and cracking has more to do with reaming then anything else. In fact I've heard that given as why not to build cake in a meer. But my little billiard pipe (I just realized it might be named that because you can clench it while playing without getting in the way) colors noticeably and without fading per smoke and didn't really start showing any color change at all till the cake showed up. So long story short I am pretty stoked about your experiment. Especially since I've suspected the same thing.I'm going to give it a go. When cake is heated, it softens. That may be what is being absorbed and being meticulously clean with them is taking away the opportunity to do so.
nah it actually just ghost the pipe hard. Or at least that's been my experience with trying it. Like it seeps the flavor upwards somehow and seems to actually just taste more and more like the original tobacco used then whatever you smoke through it. It does get a weird kind hardish semi cake type of fusion thing happening. I know cause I had one pipe that the dottle would not tap out and it triggered my stubborn side. Like oh you want to stay then you can stay!!! Once it was cleared out left a really strange ghost that was incredibly strong for a few smokes and then would be absent for 90 percent of the smoke and then show up one hundred percent and then ten smokes later it never came back. Though maybe it was just that tobacco in that pipe that one time.They used a "tobacco plug" which, if I understand correctly, is just that they keep the wet dottle in the bottom of the chamber like a plug, and leave it there for every smoke.
I wonder why they even did it if it doesn't work? It may just be superstition, or the practice of putting some kind of button like thing in the bowl. But I don't think that it will be the best smoking experience possible, since a clean pipe tastes a bit better than a soggy one.nah it actually just ghost the pipe hard. Or at least that's been my experience with trying it. Like it seeps the flavor upwards somehow and seems to actually just taste more and more like the original tobacco used then whatever you smoke through it. It does get a weird kind hardish semi cake type of fusion thing happening. I know cause I had one pipe that the dottle would not tap out and it triggered my stubborn side. Like oh you want to stay then you can stay!!! Once it was cleared out left a really strange ghost that was incredibly strong for a few smokes and then would be absent for 90 percent of the smoke and then show up one hundred percent and then ten smokes later it never came back. Though maybe it was just that tobacco in that pipe that one time.
oh I meant I don't think it would necessarily get nasty.I wonder why they even did it if it doesn't work? It may just be superstition, or the practice of putting some kind of button like thing in the bowl. But I don't think that it will be the best smoking experience possible, since a clean pipe tastes a bit better than a soggy one.
As long as it tastes ok I'll keep the plug goingoh I meant I don't think it would necessarily get nasty.
Never had any luck in coloring meers. I think I know why now.
Let me suggest this, they only had one pipe they smoked.Tobacco back then couldn't be much different from what it is now? Either they smoked their pipes a lot more, or they made the pipes differently, or they were precolored in some way. I don't know what else to think about it.