Ask G. L. Pease (Volume 30)
.gif)
-
Kevin Godbee - Oct 16, 2013
- 11 min read
G. L. Pease
The Pinot harvest is officially over, at least in our little corner of the world, and the juices have been merrily fermenting away. It’s been an incredible experience for me to work with and learn from Scott Rich of Talisman, enduring early mornings picking in the vineyards (those who know me know that I do not normally get up before the sun, but I somehow managed), endless hours hand-sorting clusters, de-stemming, macerating, punching-down, pressing, barreling. Now begins the seemingly endless wait for the wines to luxuriate in their oak casks for as long as two years until ready to be bottled, and then to rest in the bottles for another year or so before being ready to drink. Fortunately, I’ve got some bottles from previous vintages to enjoy in the interim, though not nearly enough of them to last.
Again, I find parallels between wines and tobaccos. In many ways, at least with the better examples of each, they are on a similar schedule. Though it takes many years of careful cultivation for the vines to deliver their best fruit, while tobacco plants go from seedling to stalk in a matter of months, we can reasonably start the clock at harvest time. In a couple years, I’ll be participating in the bottling of wines that I had a hand in making, and will be working with tobaccos from the same vintage. Those wines, and those tobaccos, though certainly enjoyable then, will next begin an evolution into something even more wonderful with the passage of still more years.
During all this, I’ve been working hard on a new blend that will begin shipping later this month, made from tobaccos that first emerged from the soil two to three years ago, and I plan to put some tins away to enjoy when I uncork the first bottle of the 2013 Pinots. It’s a starkly different time-line than the three minutes it takes for me to brew a press-pot of coffee in the morning.
I pulled two questions from the mail-bag this month, or four, depending on how you count them, but I thought they were interesting enough to devote some significant space to, so let’s get going.
Steve asks: What is the purpose of casing tobacco? I’ve heard that the casing doesn’t affect the flavor of the tobacco as it’s just adding sugars, but then others say that casing does change the taste of the tobacco. What’s the real deal with casings?
A: What a great question! There are sort of two answers, one easy, one less so. First, the easy one: Not all casing is simply the addition of sugars. In fact, in most cases, additional flavorings are also added at this early stage of processing. Anise, liquorice, chocolate, vanilla, brown sugar, molasses, various fruit and spice extracts, are common additions to the casing sauce, and each of these things can make a considerable contribution to the overall flavor profile of the finished product. So, though one of the purposes of casing is to add sugar to the tobacco, which can help tame a hot burning leaf, it’s actually uncommon for casing sauces to not have additional elements, which probably makes clear why cased tobacco usually tastes different from the same leaf left in its natural state. That’s the easy answer.
The harder answer is that even if there is no additional flavoring added during the casing process, the resulting tobacco would taste very different from the original, for a few reasons. The additional sugars will affect the overall chemistry of the smoke, alter the way it burns, the pH, the ash content, even the moisture content, all of which will change the way your palate perceives it.
To go a bit further, let’s use a culinary example. Imagine a summer peach, perfectly tree-ripened, juicy, succulent, naturally sweet and deliciously packed with peachy goodness. From the moment you get the first whiff of it, you’re mind begins to anticipate its taste, and that first bite is the very essence of summer itself. As the juices run down your chin, there is no mistaking what you’re eating. Now, imagine a tin of the same peaches, preserved in a heavy sugar syrup. Of course, you’re going to expect them to be sweeter, but what happened to all that peachiness? Where’s the aroma we expect from the pure fruit? Where’s the depth of flavor, the characteristic that identify it? It’s there, somewhere, but it’s hiding behind the heavy curtains of that syrup. Even the texture and what we often refer to as “mouth feel” is different. They’re both peaches, but one is delivered in its pure state, the other transformed into something still enjoyable (my father loved tinned peaches), but very different.
The same thing happens with tobaccos. Compare a natural, high-sugar virginia with one that’s enhanced with sugars, and you’ll find two very different experiences. One is the pure expression of the leaf itself, the other something quite different. Again, they can both be delicious, but they can be so different from one another as to not seem like the same leaf at all.
So, why are tobaccos so often sugared? Again, there’s more than one answer. With virginias, which often have a very high sugar content to start with, it can be done to make the finished product more consistent. While the difference between 20% and 22% sugar may seem small, it’s actually very noticeable to most smokers. Some blenders might use different leaf in a combination to maintain a consistent taste, while others might rely on their casing to accomplish the same thing.
Or, in the case of burleys, which have little or no natural sugars once the leaf is cured and aged, casings are added to smooth out the taste. Contrary to common belief, high-sugar leaf does not result in “bite”; the opposite is actually true. Raw burley can be very aggressive to the tongue and throat due to its higher pH; blending with sweet virginias, or adding sugar through casing does much to tame the “burley curse.”
Finally, blenders sometimes develop a “house style” through the use of unique sauces, which is one of the reasons people often gravitate to a specific brand, or away from another. Casing is just another tool in the blender’s box of tricks to deliver a product with a consistent taste and aroma profile to the smoker.
Phew. See? Not so simple.
Ed asks of me these questions three, ere the other side we’ll see: Three questions if I may trespass on your generosity and patience. Well, to be honest two questions, one supplementary and a request for an encyclopedic explanation of condimental tobacco.
My first question is on the ageing of Robusto – simply the best mixture I have smoked in 35 years. I have cellared about 5-7 years supply (depends on how much your other blends distract me) but how long will it retain the characteristics of a “stout and stalwart companion” ? I am thinking mainly about the nicotine strength and speed of combustion. The motive behind this question is that I would like to extend this stockpile as I fear that here in the UK there may soon come a day when importation is no longer possible. Also will Robusto (or any other tobacco – this is a sort of general supplementary question) age differently in two and eight ounce tins much like wine in half, full size and bigger bottles?
My second question is on blending, not the magic of mixing tobaccos to find a new taste where the fun is to experiment, but a specific maneuver. Is there a tobacco that can be added to an existing blend to give it a greater nicotine strength but not change the blend’s other characteristics? To give an example how might I make Laurel Heights the same strength as, say, Robusto but keep its characteristics of taste, density of smoke and coolness (it is the coolest smoking virginia mixture I have ever come across)? Well I admit that is a bit of a stretch but at least edge it a bit in the desired direction.
The last question is really more of a request for you to extend your fascinating series on the growing and processing of tobaccos (especially how differences in method/location can change the outcome) to the condimental ones especially perique, kentucky, latakia (Cyprian only as I fear Syrian is now sadly of historical interest) and the cigar leaf in Robusto / Key Largo. Maybe one a month as the whole lot might overload a single article.
A: Great questions, and I wouldn’t dream of breaking them up, so here goes. (And, thanks for the compliment on Robusto.) The way a tobacco mixture will age over the long-term is a complicated thing to predict. One thing that is certain is that the processes slow down over time, being most rapid in the first few years of the tobaccos being tinned, then tapering off to a relative plateau, and finally beginning a slow descent. How long this takes depends on the tobaccos in the blend. On the one side, virginias and virginia/perique blends seem to have life expectancy that’s longer than ours. I’ve tasted Three Nuns with 60 years behind it, and it was sublime, suffering not the slightest from all those decades of rest.
On the other hand, latakia mixtures, according to some, reach their peak in the five to six year timeframe, and then begin to decline more rapidly. Personally, I think this has got more to do with the overall makeup of the mixture than with the latakia, itself. Yes, the smoky stuff gets softer, loses some of its edge, but that transformation can result in something elegant and beautiful if the overall structure is solid, much in the way a powerhouse premier cru Medoc can, with the passage of time, gracefully transform into something of elegance and complexity. If, on the other hand, there’s little beyond the loud voice of latakia, the blend will get dull, flat and boring, like a youthful, bright Beaujolais Nouveau, pleasant enough in November, but long since dead by Easter. I’ve smoked plenty of mixtures that retained their charms well into their thirties, and continue to shine.
Strength is a different matter. Though there’s nowhere for the nicotine to go, and it doesn’t seem to break down through aging (I recently tasted some 99-year old virginia cigarettes that about knocked me on my backside), the pH of the tobacco can change with age, resulting in a greater or lesser effective strength, as nicotine is more quickly delivered to the bloodstream in alkaline environments than in acidic ones. I don’t know of any studies on this, but anecdotally, some tobaccos I’ve smoked have seemed stronger when aged, some milder, so the jury is still deliberating with Robusto. The oldest samples I’ve had, about ten years old, have still been plenty stout.
And, yes, package size matters, but it’s different from wines, where aging is mediated by the volume of the bottle’s contents in comparison with the gas exchange through the cork. In tobaccos, the density of the packaging makes quite a difference. Our 8oz tins are more tightly packed than the 2oz ones, thus having less free oxygen, so the aging dynamics are different. It’s not so much a faster/slower thing as it is a matter of difference. And, once the tin is opened, new changes begin to take place, like a wine’s “breathing.” Personally, I prefer the smaller tins for aging, and the larger ones for regular smoking.
Now, on to the second question. Any tobacco you add to an existing blend will change its character in profound ways. You could add something like a Kentucky dark-fired to increase strength, or a strong VA leaf, but it will also change the taste and the smoking characteristics significantly. Burley can be very chameleon-like, so it might be a good choice. When first blended, its distinctive, nutty taste is very prominent, but this will change over time, taking on the characteristics of the other tobaccos in the blend. It won’t disappear completely, but it might be the best way to get a little more kick out of a blend without changing it too much.
Now, for your third question. That does sound interesting, and would be fun to research, but it might be of little more than academic interest, overall. In order to isolate the effects of growing conditions from the seed stock itself, it would be necessary to grow the same cultivars in different soils, in different climates, under different agricultural practices. I’ll certainly put it on my list of things to look more deeply into. There might be some good starting points in the literature already.
Wow. That’s it for this month; I’m spent. Keep those cards and letters coming!
-glp
 Since 1999, Gregory L. Pease has been the principal alchemist behind the blends of G.L. Pease Artisanal Tobaccos. He’s been a passionate pipeman since his university days, having cut his pipe teeth at the now extinct Drucquer & Sons Tobacconist in Berkeley, California. Greg is also author of The Briar & Leaf Chronicles, a photographer, recovering computer scientist, sometimes chef, and creator of The Epicure’s Asylum. See our interview with G. L. Pease here. |
Written by Kevin Godbee
More Pipes and Tobaccos Articles
7 Responses
Smokingpipes.com Updates
36 Fresh Tsuge Pipes |
48 Fresh Savinelli Pipes |
12 Fresh Mark Tinsky Pipes |
120 Fresh Peterson Pipes |
6 Fresh Castello Pipes |
Recent Posts
His grandfather came to the US with a $50 gold coin in his shoe, opened up a cigar shop, and his most famous customer was Babe Ruth. He holds the record for the longest slow smoke in the world at over 24 hours, and he is the only man who stopped Chuck Norris from round-house kicking the Nording Pipe Statue. The most interesting man in the world, Jonathan Goldsmith, stopped by the Chicago Pipe Show this year to get kissed on the cheek by Neal Osborn. Wait, what? OK, I kid. Jonathan came to honor his friend and fishing buddy Steve Norse of Vermont Freehand at the annual Doctors and Masters of Pipes award dinner. Steve was one of the two recipients of the Masters of Pipes award and asked Johnathan to show up and add some color to his acceptance speech. Slightly overshadowed but no less important! Jay Furman was also honored as this year’s hobbyist Master of Pipes, joining me and a pipe-star-studded list of great contributors to the hobby and profession of pipes. Jay is a character in his own right. While I don’t know him as well as I would like, I’ve learned that he’s a kind-hearted collector who started the Artisan Pipe Makers Club, a place where new artisans learn, grow, and are challenged. There are around 60 artisans who participate, collaborate, and learn. Jay and Mike Bishop also started the Long Island Pipe Club, which has around 50 members and meets twice a month on different sides of the island. What is not featured here are pictures of the Doctors of Pipes. Both recipients were unable to attend: Marco Parascenzo – Doctor of Pipes, Trade/Industry Regis MacCafferty – Doctor of Pipes, Hobby Please join us in congratulating these newly inducted Doctors and Masters of Pipes. It is a great honor, and each of these men embodies what our hobby and industry strive to do: grow, educate, and cultivate its future. I encourage everyone to attend the dinner next year as it’s always illuminating. And now, on with the show. Sort of. You may be wondering what the most interesting pipe smoker in the world smokes…. I didn’t miss the opportunity to chat with this incredibly nice man, whom Brian Levine and I also remembered from one of our favorite TV shows, the A-Team. He was also in many other shows from the 80s, such as Magnum PI, Murder She Wrote, Dallas, and MacGyver, just to name a few. Jonathan: I actually enjoy simple and readily available tobacco like Captain Black or some black cavendish from my local cigar and pipe shop in Vermont. What about your first pipe? Jonathan: I picked up my first pipe; I think it was a billiard when I was in London many years ago at a place called James Fox. How often do you smoke? Jonathan: Almost every day. I enjoy a pipe in the morning and a cigar in the afternoon. I want to thank Jonathan Goldsmith for taking a few minutes to sit down with me and being gracious enough to snap pictures with many of us at the show; it was a ton of fun and made this year’s show even more memorable! This year, the Chicago Pipe Show kicked it up a notch with a new location, new signage, new pre-registration and payment system, new show executive staff, and lots of new surprises. Now, Tim Garrity, President of the Chicagoland Pipe Club, tells me that over 400 attendees were at the show, but they are still tabulating the numbers too, so this is subject to getting updated and expanded. We do have our dates for next year at this same location – the first weekend of May at the Hyatt Regency, Chicago O’Hare. Of course, like any good Chicago show, there was plenty of room hopping and the announcement board. The signage this year was super helpful in knowing where to go when to go, and what tables our favorite vendors were at. While the show was jam-packed, the spacing of the tables allowed everyone to move around freely and didn’t feel over-crowded as the tables and isles were spaced out to allow room for vendors and collectors to stretch out. The smoking tent was hopping all the time, but luckily, air flow and some great air purifiers by Lake Air kept it fresh. As usual, there was a great sample table with tons of things to try in the tent, and on your way to the tent, there was a conveniently placed cash bar. This year the tent was 25% bigger than last year, although you wouldn’t notice because there were more people at the show! Kaywoodie is under new Management. At the show, I chatted with Nathan “Greywoodie” Davis about how he came to take over the 173-year-old company. Tell me how this happened. Nathan: This month is my 5th anniversary of Greywoodie opening. I was friends with Bill and had a huge collection of Kaywoodies – I approached him about having them available outside of brick and mortar. He had no online presence and didn’t sell direct. He said if I wanted them to be more available, the best thing I could do was quit my job and sell them myself. He was mostly kidding because I had a really good job in the legal profession, but I wasn’t happy so one day I did give him a call and said “hey whats your minimum order,” and he said “You didn’t just quit your job because I was joking?” I did and I started out that way as an online retailer. So, in working with him, we did exclusives, and I learned about pipe making from him, both production and hand-made. We brought back some historical lines as well, and soon enough, I was helping to make the pipes I was buying from him. It was great for him to get my labor […]
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 605. Our featured interview tonight is with Pete Prevost. Pete is a pipe maker and the President of the BriarWorks pipe factory in Columbia Tennessee. BriarWorks is a a pipe maker co-op with several other pipe makers, including Todd Johnson, who co-founded it with Pete. Brian and Pete will be talking about what’s new at BriarWorks, and how they are getting ready to attend the Chicago pipe show. (This was recorded before the show that took place last weekend.) At the top of the show, Brian will give his report of his travels and what happened at the Chicago show.
When I first started with the pipe as a quirky and precocious teen, the only tutelage I had at my disposal were scenes from old movies in which a well dressed chap would stick his pipe into a pouch, scoop tobacco into the bowl and press it down unceremoniously with his thumb. Then, with great flourish, he’d strike a match and light the thing with all manner of cinematic excess, puffing up vast clouds of smoke falling just short of completely obscuring his visage. While it may look good on film, it’s a terrible approach to actually enjoying the thing. Somehow, though, this “technique” seems to have survived in the contemporary vernacular, at least to some extent, even with bit-loads of information handily at our fingertips that should dissuade us from the practice. But, at the time, this misguided approach was all I had; it’s no wonder my early days of puffing were fraught with difficult lighting, harsh, bitter smokes and tongue bite, all culminating in a fireproof mass of ye old soggy dottle in the bottom of the bowl. Ultimately, the resulting frustration made me give up the pipe, at least for a while. While the idea of it was still very appealing, the practice of it was not. It wasn’t until a few years later when, still full of curiosity and romantic notions of pipe smoking, I wandered into a real tobacconist’s shop, and learned my “method” was a long way from the techniques that would bring me to any sort of pipe smoking bliss. So, after my poor start, and under the guidance of someone who actually seemed to know how to do it right, I was given the opportunity to approach the process anew, this time with much greater success. It was only because I was both perseverent, and fortunate to have a local shop staffed with knowledgeable people, that I’ve been able to enjoy the experience ever since. At least mostly… How many fledgeling pipe smokers have simply given up on an enjoyable pastime because of similar early mis-starts? Fortunately, today, it’s not hard to find helpful guidance at the press of a key or ten. But, at the same time, not all roads lead to Valhalla, and sometimes the advice offered might well be labeled with, “Here be dragons.” The other day, I came across a short video on-line in which a well-meaning tobacconist suggested packing a bowl of an “English” mixture “nice and tight.” Perhaps somewhat ironically, I was smoking, or trying to smoke a bowl that I’d filled on auto-pilot, packed too tightly, and not only was having the devil of a time trying to keep it lit, I really wasn’t enjoying the acrid smoke the tobacco issued during the brief periods in which it was actually burning. “No, no, NO!” I found myself muttering at my pipe, and at the figure on the screen, my protests joined by the guttural growling noises that sometimes accompany my discontent. Defiantly, I grabbed a pipe nail, shoveled out the dense, asbestos-like clog from the bowl, swabbed out the shank with a pipe cleaner, more out of habit than need since I hadn’t actually smoked enough of the mass to foul the shank, and started over, this time paying proper attention to what I was doing. (For as long as I’ve been doing this, I still screw it all up sometimes.) Much better. This got me thinking about a couple things that are so important to the maximal enjoyment of our pipes, yet not often enough discussed, namely how different tobaccos respond to variations in filling density, and moisture content; two separate but related parameters. Once I’d been shown the proper way to fill the bowl, or at least a proper way, everything had changed for me. I also began drying my tobacco down as a matter of course. Suddenly, there was greater cooperation between leaf and flame, the smoke was rich and flavorful, and it burned mostly to the bottom of the bowl with few relights. Given that, at the time, I smoked latakia mixtures almost exclusively, there didn’t seem to be a reason to explore beyond my “new” approach. It wasn’t until my attention turned in the direction of Virginia blends that I had to look a bit deeper. The same technique that worked so well for me with latakia mixtures resulted in bland, and often harsh smokes with Virginias. I attributed this to the tobaccos, convincing myself that I just didn’t like the stuff. At one of our pipe club meetings, I was talking with a friend who smoked Three Nuns exclusively. When he offered me a bowl. I thanked him, and told him that I just didn’t seem to get along well with Virginias, that they weren’t for me. “Maybe it’s the way you pack them. Here, let me fill your pipe for you.” I watched as he rubbed out a few coins to fine ribbons, moister than I was then accustomed to, and filled the bowl carefully in stages, pressing it tighter than I would have. Prepared for a nightmare, I was instead treated to a pipe dream. The tobacco smoldered slowly and almost continuously, delivering a rich, cool, sweet and delicious smoke. After that, I spent some time exploring the impact of these two variables, moisture content and packing density, on different mixtures and blends, always with similar results. Latakia mixtures, and to a lesser extent, those with a high percentage of oriental leaf, taste and smoke better when they’re on the dry side and the bowl is filled loosely, while Virginia blends tend to work best with a little more moisture and a denser fill. Burleys seem to work best somewhere in between, except for cube-cuts, which don’t like to be packed with much pressure at all. (Gravity fill, tap the bowl to settle the cubes. Repeat until full.) For such a simple act, pipe smoking is filled with undefined complexities! The point behind all this? Often […]
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 604. Our featured interview tonight is with Jon David Cole. JD is the Owner/Tobacconist at The Country Squire in Jackson, MS, and he is the former co-host of the podcast, Country Squire Radio, which ended their 10-year run last year. We’ll have JD with the “From the Country Squire” segment talking about all the new things happening at the store and in the business in general. At the top of the show, we’ll continue our audio tour of Brian’s pipe collection.
Before we begin, I should tell you: this tobacco review is being written by an A.I. Not the fancy new GPTs or their ilk; no, this is last century’s meat-and-bone, all-organic model. To be fair, a large part of what we call knowledge is merely the accumulated perceptions and impressions gathered from a life wandered through, synthesized into a spongy mass of what-it-is-that-we-think-that-we-know. The algorithm for this prompt is simple enough: pump thousands of bowls of smoldering plant matter into a gaping maw, cross-reference the chemical sensations with all other matter previously ingested or inhaled, sieve it all through the diffuse and fractal twin lens of memory and emotion, and churn out a panoply of adjectives that attempts to convey the sensations to someone who hasn’t experienced it yet. Odds are that a diligently trained monkey could succeed half the time; if this reviewer nears fifty-one percent then that would qualify as an unrivaled success. There must have been some similar musings perambulating through the mind of Per Jensen when he began his mad scientist routine at Sutliff with the Pipe Force project, which brings us to the current mixture under the microscope—Sutliff’s Pipe Force: Episode I. Here again are the unusual ingredients that engendered the series, with the stoved Rustica being the defining voice in this composition. From the tin: The Latakia-forward English mixture offers plenty of smoky flavor from the fire-cured leaf, which is artfully harmonized with floral, earthy Stoved Rustica. A mixture of high-grade Virginias imparts a natural sweetness. Katerini, the sole Oriental component, offers herb and spice notes bringing complexity and nuance to the flavor profile. It’s certainly Latakia-forward, with the stoved Rustica doubling up on the rhythm section like a second bassist. A first whiff from the tin releases the aromas of shoe leather and hide glue in a base of clay soil with a campfire wafted over it like last night’s beach party. Once it’s been accustomed to oxygen again, subtle hints of sweetness poke through from the Virginias: lemon rind, light milk chocolate, the dregs of a peaty Scotch, and muddled cherry. Old regulars like fresh-sawn oak and tilled earth are there, of course, with distinct notes of truffle, creosote, damp peat, and pine bark mulch. As an aside, I’ve been re-potting my camellias and the similarity of aroma to the ericaceous soil mix is notable; the Katerini really brings the unique depth of its vegetal complexion when supported by the Rustica and afforded more voice in the mix. The smoky Cyprian Latakia, in turn, is backed by equal earthiness from the Rustica, which overall exhibits a profile similar to dark-fired Kentucky; it leans more toward the woody and vegetal end of that spectrum, echoing and amplifying those traits of the other constituents. The tobacco is presented pressed and cut into a couple of thick, hearty flakes in the tin, lightly moist and easily crumbled to prepare—I prefer mine with a bit of drying time. The out-of-this-world tin art for this episode in the series is Major O’Meara smoking a cavalier. In the absence of confirmation, I’m going to hazard a guess he’s of the Ithklur species. The first taste from the light is sweet, with hints of that milk chocolate dancing around the edges. The Virginia leads the smoke through the top of the bowl, and orchestrates it well. Thoroughly smoky with lemony, grassy highlights from the Virginia spectrum, it soon segues into the mid-bowl profile: heartier, smokier, with the flavor leaning to the mildly acrid and tangy tinge that is the campfire-esque signature of English blends. Caution advised, it can turn overly bitter if pushed—this is where one’s sipping technique is required to maintain the fullness of flavor through to the heel. I did tend toward a lot of relights, though it may have as much to do with technique as with the blend. Pacing is also important as the nicotine starts to manifest; though the Rustica’s contribution has been tempered well by the stoving, it can certainly upend an empty stomach. At the end of every bowl, the mouthfeel somehow gets better. The balance of sugars in the tobaccos would seem to be spot-on in this regard. I started out my tasting in cobs, then cut short an unpleasant bowl in a meer, and finally landed on my best instrument with the lovely Dunhill 4427 pictured, a quaint group 4 shell briar with a gentle curve and Cumberland stem supporting a perfectly executed acorn bowl. It surprised me here, as I’ve learned through the years that I generally have the best experience with English blends in large, wide bowls. With this blend it seems that to get the best out of the Katerini’s somewhat diaphanous influence the smaller bowl fared much better. Room note is very English, so the company you keep will either love it or hate it, and it doesn’t linger too much. I find it paired best with a strong coffee; Sumatran beans complement the flavors well, as do Ethiopian if a lighter brew is preferred. Overall impressions of the blend are that it’s a curiously interesting take on the English genre, almost a reductive reconstruction of the theme using the unique components. This blend, if nothing else, expanded my vocabulary of sense perceptions with the uniquely treated leaf. While the average human can distinguish approximately one trillion (1,000,000,000,000!) different aromas, multiplied by seven basic tastes, and wholly dependent on variables from body chemistry to atmospheric conditions, our overworked and underpaid simian brains can’t effectively catalog them all. Our pet adding machines are exceedingly good at this, however, and someday soon they’ll be the ultimate and unequivocal authority on what something tastes, smells, looks, or even feels like. Until that time, friends, revel in the moments that can be stolen to savor over a bowl of Pipe Force: Episode I.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 603. Our featured interview tonight is with Rick Newcombe. Rick is a well-known author of several pipe books, and he is currently working on his third book. He is a prominent collector of Danish pipes, and vintage tobaccos. He has traveled the world visiting pipe makers, and learning their different techniques. He is also the founder and chairman of Creators Syndicate, which currently represents more than 200 writers and artists. At the top of the show we’ll have a Pipe Smoking 101 segment discussing best pipe shapes and sizes that are best suited to certain types of tobacco.
Thanks for another interesting and informative read — despite the homophonic errors (but that happens to me too because they slip passed grammar checkers). 🙂 I should add that it is a nicely illustrated piece too.
.
I read in Milton Sherman’s “All About Tobacco”, that Maryland leaf, which is probably scarce these days, is a gregarious blender (which I interpret to mean neutral tasting) that is useful in moderating a blend’s burn rate; and I think it could probably be used to dilute the concentration of nicotine in any given volume of tobacco.
Ah, those damned homophones. Fixed the one I found, but your plural implies more than one. I’m a bit homophonephobic, so I’m surprised I’m surprised that I committed such an egregious error, but I’ll blame it on late nights and influence of Forest for Trees Syndrome. Then again, I just write the stuff; I’m not the editor…
.
Maryland is a wonderful tobacco, not as often used as I think it should be. (I’ve been working on changing that…) It burns beautifully, is low in nicotine, but has a flavor profile very similar to burley’s, and also shares some of its cousin’s chameleon characteristics. In the old days, I produced a blend called “Inverness” that used Maryland to good effect. Sadly, it also used Syrian Latakia to good effect, or I’d have brought it back to life by now.
I have always been curious about casing and processing tobacco, but find the information available to be very gerneral. That being said, your answer above really helps the reader understand the theory behind the process. However, it seems like, for a consumer, to fully understand the effects of tobacco casings, you would need to try the same leaf with different processes / casings. Similar to your example about the effects of terrier.
In my personal quest to fully understand tobacco casings, I grew my own tobacco in my garden in 2012, and am in the process of fermenting the 1 year aged leaf in my homemade kiln. I do not plan on, and have not added any casing or sprays to the tobacco. All I am doing is hanging the leaf in the kiln with basic tap water to create steam / humidity. I will press the leaf and see what it tastes like. Next year, I will have to try this process, this time using a casing of sorts and see how that changes the flavor.
Thanks for the informative article.
Greg, thanks for the great answers. On the strength of it I will continue my cellaring programme for the wonderful Robusto (currently smoking some about 18 months old which is already darkening beautifully in taste and reminds me in style of something from the “Golden Age of Sobranie” but which I never quite found a particular mixture as good as in the late 70’s). I will try a little Burley with Laurel Heights (great with China tea) and some Maryland with Jackknife, if I can find some (don’t think C&D sell it separately) or, if not, look out for a very tiny bowled pipe. Very helpful though.
Talisman sounds a fascinating wine. I have had a shot at tracing a UK stockist but sadly does not seem to be one but I will email them just to check.
Looking forward to Gaslight, the tobacco of the vintage, so to speak. I see the consensus on the net from the tease is it will be Latakia driven but I wondered if the keynote might be what we used to call Turkish (think aroma of the old Sullivan Turkish cigarettes) but which might now be called Izmir??? The time of anticipation is always marvellous!!!
Regards and thanks
Ed
Ed, a couple of things. First, I’ve updated my site with more details about Gaslight, and there are also a couple of video reviews of it on uT00b. It’s an exciting one for me, and I couldn’t be more chuffed that people seem to be enjoying it. Second, Talisman is a small, boutique winery in Sonoma. Quite small production, and I don’t know if it’s possible to ship into the UK. I’ll see what I can find out for you. Third, I couldn’t agree more regarding the Sobranie. If you’ve read my article on the subject, you’ll know that they had a pop at the recipe after the transfer to that other firm. Seriously, reducing Latakia form nearly 50% to 35%, and thinking no one would notice? Maybe they didn’t…
.
Please report back on your blending experiments. I’m sure they would be of interest to many of our readers.
.
-glp
Greg, Thanks, great reviews – had to smile at the sailor pipe being smoked in Mike’s review; I had thought they were just Tom Eltang’s little joke but now will probably get one as amusing & perhaps good for strongish tobacco, a sailor for Navigator perhaps. Also the redoubtable Bear Graves has a great Gaslight review/tease/short story on the smoking pipes website. Now its just “on your marks” for the race to grab a half dozen on the great day it appears.
On Talisman thanks – if there is a UK stockist they are below the internet radar.
I am afraid we did notice what Sobranie’s later owners did during the the late 70s & 80’s – I smoked the Director’s Virginia ready rubbed (sorry I can not quite remember title – I used to ask for the Sobranie in the brown tin back then) and first its depth and subtlety leeched away but then it appeared in ribbon form without a by your leave. The joke is that some years later I heard from someone in the trade that Balkan Sobranie, the last one of the range to be marketed in the UK sadly reduced to an OTC in supermarkets, was eventually pulled partly because it was detracting from the prestige of some cigarette product (not the old Sobranie cigarettes I suspect) they were pushing. To take that range and turn it into a detractor of prestige from the brand name ……. well you just have to laugh at them.
I shall indeed report back on my blending experiments – I hope to at least learn something about some interesting blends and, no doubt, to acquire the odd amusing anecdote.
Ed
Were can I find condor baccy in the U.S please help