When I began the pipe after my 30 year hiatus I had an intense attack of TAD, acquiring tins of all genres from a variety of blenders. It didn’t take long for me to discover that Dunhill’s My Mixture 965 had a practically religious following. I asked my tobacconist about it and he said that a fair proportion of pipers smoke nothing else, that it’s the only blend they know and they won’t even consider anything else.
It was around this time that My Mixture 965 was added to Tobacco Reviews’s Pipe Tobacco Hall of Fame.
Well, that certainly clinched it. 965 jumped to the top of my shortlist for blends I had to try. With so many ardent fans, and now a Hall of Famer, it had to be a winner, right?
In my zeal to try new blends I had somehow forgotten that I am naturally wary of anything that has achieved mainstream success: Barney the Dinosaur, Madonna, American football, religion…
But that’s what happens when puppy love and newfound cravings intersect inside your brain — the object of desire short-circuits directly into the realm of necessity, bypassing common-sense.
I had by this time befriended the five remaining tobacconists in Toronto, from downtown to Yorkville, and I knew which one had it for the best price: a little store called Cheers located on a dilapidated yet trendy backstreet in the university/hospital district. It’s run by a bald, really cranky oriental man and his wife. The store has a little walk-in humidor, cases of pipes and pouches, shelves and shelves of tins, cabinets with pipes and other smoking paraphernalia, and display cases of Buddhist themed tchotckes, all of it crammed in a small newsdealer-type store. He’s got the best selection and prices in Toronto by a long shot, maybe even all of Canada for all I know. He’s got the entire catalogue of Dunhill, McClelland, Peterson, Solani, Samuel Gawith, Davidoff, J. F. Germain, and a few others. It’s become my primary source in Canada for tobacco. Fortunately my pilgrimages to the store are now monthly instead of bi-weekly.
So I made a special trip one day (I’m a fast walker, and can walk the 18 blocks across town from work in about twenty-two minutes) and purchased that classy, mysterious tan tin. 965. By this time the number had a mystique to me. Had they really blended 964 blends before this until they had it right? After experimenting with nearly one thousand blends, was there a “Eureka!” one dark and stormy night, just when they were on the cusp of giving up, demoralized as they were after all those years of money and toil in their pursuit of the perfect blend, until that night, when one took a puff and his irises enlarged, then another took a puff, and soon their eyes widened, finally!, finally!, holding aloft their pipes subtly glowing with a golden halo, tears streaming down their faces in wonder and joy — at last, at last hallelujah! they had finally attained a blend worthy of some godhead…!
I had obviously built up some expectations about this blend. But I’m very good at shedding preconceptions when it gets time to experience or consider something. So when I loaded up the bowl that night — that Chacom Natural Panelled Billiard I had purchased as my first pipe in over thirty years — I was ready to try a new blend, one that I had been looking forward to trying for a while.
Well, I certainly didn’t expect it to be bad. Mediocre and overrated, maybe, at worst, but not bad. But no, it was bad, really really bad, and I knew it at once. And once I decided it was bad, I certainly didn’t expect it to be that bad.
But it was. It was horrible. To this day I still consider it as the blend that defines the nadir of the spectrum. When I smoked cigarettes I once got a pack of “100% Pure Guaranteed Donkey Shit Cigarettes” during a trip to Tijuana, just for the lark of it. 965 was worse than that.
Why? What could possibly have been so terrible?
To quote myself from my review of it over at tobaccoreviews:
It started off poorly, dry and hot like a sunstroked meadow, and it was downhill from there.
That’s essentially what it was. It really was like smoking hay to me, unclean, dirty hay that had only recently been home to a family of hoofed creatures with poor hygiene.
Savagely hot and unclean really sums it up for me. It was the most unpleasant experience I’d ever had smoking a pipe.
I studied the tobacco. It looked perfectly normal, smelled perfectly normal — basically, in every way it gave the appearance of quality tobacco. But when I actually put it to the match, it tasted nothing like tobacco. In my review I liken it to “smoldering rubber or plastic”, and that was not an exaggeration for emphasis, that’s exactly what the nuances below the infernal heat tasted like.
I found it impossible to believe that anybody could like this stuff. Was it me? Were my tastebuds somehow radically different than everybody else’s? for just this blend?
But I wasn’t going to quit after one bowl. Perhaps it was because I was still a relative neophyte, returning after my long hiatus, and wasn’t accustomed to full balkan blends. But no, that couldn’t be it, because I had already decided I really like Commonwealth, British Woods, Squadron Leader, 1792, and a few other blends, just as strong or stronger, latakia or virginia. Perhaps my tastebuds were off after some strange, forgotten meal.
Whatever the reason, I was determined to try it again, and again, to see if it would get better, to try to get some idea what anybody else could possibly see in this blend. So, over the course of six months, I would force myself to go down on it give it another try, hoping that I could solve this mystery. But it was not to be — each bowl was as terrible as the previous one.
To be fair, I must admit that somehow a few sips actually had some kind of vaguely grassy flavor that wasn’t objectionable, in fact was actually almost even nice, but then it would quickly subside, then it was back to sucking rubber through a blast furnace.
I cannot account for it. I couldn’t then, and I can’t now. Maybe it was a bad tin, maybe I was the victim of some heinous prank, like the spouse who randomly kills some innocent victims instead of her husband by putting cyanide capsules in some bottles of tylenol. But no, because I eventually traded what remained in the tin (about 90%) for Kingfisher (another bad blend) with another piper, and he said it was fine, just like the other 965s he’s had.
So the mystery remains, and I expect it always will.
The shell shock to my tongue is now part of my muscle memory. This blend was so off to me, I figured Dunhill was doing something very very wrong. Or maybe Dunhill tobacco has a certain flavor that only a small percentage of people can (or can’t) taste, like PTC, an organic compound that tastes very bitter to some and tasteless to others based upon their genetic makeup. I don’t know. But whatever the reason, if this was a quintessential Dunhill blend — which, by all accounts, it is — then obviously Dunhill is not the blender for me. I’m even wary of trying their expensive pipes…
Given that there are so many other great blenders out there I don’t believe I’m doing any disservice to myself by denying myself their products. Indeed fans of Dunhill should be grateful to me that there’s one less person to take away their manna from them.
To those who love 965, I’m glad for you. Really, I am. I think it’s great when people find the thing that gives them real pleasure. But then Titanic won the Academy Award for Best Picture of 1998, Banksters are rewarded for bankrupting us with 700 Billion of our money, and yet another War Monger received the Nobel Peace Prize today.
Maybe I’ll just go smoke my pipe now… anything other than 965, that is.
Kevin said:
–> I am naturally wary of anything that has achieved mainstream success
Same with me. I have little trust in the masses.
I have never tried 965. Interestingly, after reading of how your experience was so drastically different than most, I am now intrigued to try it.
I don’t have any, but I do have a newer blend from Altadis’ Sutliff Private Stock line called “5″ which is their version of Dunhill 965. I may try this one out today.
I have three Dunhill pipes that are quite enjoyable.
You are a great writer ST. I am looking forward to your future posts.
October 11th, 2009 at 10:03 am
Bob said:
Great story ST!
I like hearing about why you didn’t like it. A lot of people will just say that they didn’t like it and leave it at that.
I also like and relate to the part where you kept trying it to see if it gets better for you. A lot of people will only take a few puffs, dump it, and then say it is horrible with out ever really making sure that it is not for them.
I have tried 1-2 bowls of Dunhill 965. I didn’t think it was bad, but I must not have been blown away by it either as I still have the rest of the tobacco sealed up in a mason jar in my cellar and I haven’t even thought about smoking it.
Maybe I will have to break it out soon and do a review on it.
October 11th, 2009 at 10:41 am
mate said:
Regarding not just baccy, but everything else
I wonder how many people like something just because every one else likes it.
For example, when I see or hear what passes at top entertainment these day, I think something must be wrong with me. BESCAUES I JUST DON’T SEE A REASON FOR ITS EXISTENCE
I never smoked the Original 956, but I have a copy from PaylessPypes.com that I like, and I like it more when I add some Oriental and a heaping dollop of Latakia
October 11th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
sinistertopiary said:
I’m glad I inspired you to try it, I would love to get your opinion about it. I honestly do not understand my inordinately strange reaction to this blend…
“I also like and relate to the part where you kept trying it to see if it gets better for you. A lot of people will only take a few puffs, dump it, and then say it is horrible with out ever really making sure that it is not for them.”
I don’t think a few puffs is enough to understand a blend. I give every blend at least four solid smokes, and usually a lot more. If I gave up after one bowl Abingdon would not be one of my favorite smokes. It takes time to get to know a baccy — sometimes a baccy gets better the more you get to know it, sometimes it gets worst. I like to give everything a second chance, and I try not to make a definitive assessment about anything after a first impression.
As for the masses, http://www.panarchy.org/asch/social.pressure.1955.html provides a cold blast of sociology to help us understand the social pressures of conformity… History is replete with examples of how difficult it is to be right when everyone else is wrong.
October 13th, 2009 at 10:29 am
The Individual said:
While I enjoy 965 and horde my stash of personally canned five pounds, I do have to admit that it is a sacred cow within our community. I think a better example, now, would be Pease’s blends. His stuff is the modern day 965, IMO. I mean, heck, he’s even doing a calendar and most pipers do nothing, but praise the guy. This is fine, but I have never cared for any of his blends.
As the saying goes, smoke what you enjoy and enjoy your smoke.
November 5th, 2009 at 12:48 am
sinistertopiary said:
If you enjoy 965, and his stuff is the modern day 965, wouldn’t that mean you’d enjoy his stuff?
But I take it that the point was sacred cows. Yes, there seem to be a vocal minority that share your view about his current stature.
Me, of the few blends of his that I’ve tried I like the majority of them, a couple of them quite a lot. Now I’m keen to try more of them. I wonder what your opinion would be of his newest, Chelsea Morning, which I thought was pretty great.
November 5th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
Kevin said:
I love Maltese Falcon by G.L. Pease.
November 6th, 2009 at 8:24 am
dunendain said:
Dunhill 965 was one of the 1st tobaccos I smoked that contained Latakia. It was so much better than the cheap, putrid cherry and vanilla mixtures I had smoked when I was a newbie. After those early days, I have found many superior Latakia blends. Like Peter Stokkebye’s Proper English, McClelland’s British Woods and some good Balkans as well. I don’t miss 965. By the way, has anyone heard from John “Mate”?
January 4th, 2010 at 5:55 pm
Impugn My Tastebuds, Will You? | Smoldering Yens said:
[...] few months later I traded a tin of the dreaded 965 for a tin of Butera’s Kingfisher, a VaPer hybrid with burley. (I will admit to not [...]
February 6th, 2010 at 4:22 pm