Whether they put vanilla in there, or a combination of chemicals form to make an almondy, vanilla-y aroma, I (and those in the room with me) smell a touch of vanilla... and almonds. Also, you don't HAVE to use a knife. The "plug" breaks apart easily by just fidgeting with the "plug" with your fingers to easily break up the tobacco for smoking. I break up the entire plug for mine to make it easier to load my pipes.
That said, all arguments aside, despite... it is an amazing new tobacco that I am glad to have around. An American Lakeland of sorts. Whether it tastes like the original or not, which 97% of us will never ever be able to compare it to.
Despite it not being a plug, or whatever the exact chemical concoction is, I still enjoy it, regardless. I enjoy the hell out of it.
It does make me wonder while smoking it... I end up pondering why companies have evolved to use the certain flavors that they do in adding a flavor to an aromatic. Purity laws... everyone refers to purity laws, but is vanilla, cherry, and apple not about the same "purity" as tonquin beans or rose, or geranium oils? What the hell were they using before such purity laws? Were they making tobaccos that smelled like Channel #5 or British Sterling, or even Brutt cologne? I could see why the Danish and other Germanic companies using flavors used in the pastries that they were so famous for in those regions... I can see why the Americans used the sugary flavors they had on hand also... I can even understand using flavors that enhance the natural flavors of tobacco like plums and apricots... But, tonquin beans and geraniums? Did the English just pull those flavors out because they were all that was left in the cologne industry after you remove the other chemicals that make up their perfume industry?
I'd be interested to try a small sample of a tobacco that lead to there being a purity law.
All that said, War Horse, all of the War Horses, are on my list of favorite tobaccos, despite...