I was talking with a friend the other day. He dislikes Republicans but often leans conservative although he does not know it yet. Being from a minority group, he fears encroachment of majority policies. My counterpoint was that the way the US was originally designed had two advantages:
(1) People could do just about anything.
(2) But, others were not required to subsidize them.
So it's a double-edged sword. You can smoke meth until your eyes cross, but no one is forced to give you medical care. You can get married as a gay person, but no one is forced to bake you a cake. You can say "no Negroes in my town," but no one is forced to build roads there. You can declare yourself transgender, but there's no affirmative action and no one is forced to hire you on penalty of lawsuit.
It's interesting in contrast to present politics, where we get two varieties of:
(1) You must do what government/science/popular opinion says is The One Right Way.
(2) Everyone must pay for everyone else no matter how dysfunctional
Since the 1950s, our budget has more than doubled, all of it to go to pay for social programs. Plank #2 conflicts with those in the original American vision, and without those, the need for manic taxes on everything goes down.
I never was an anti-tax person, but increasingly I'm becoming that way. Let nature do her work: let me keep what I make, and pay for only things that benefit everyone, not payments to specific groups. Let me act in self-interest. The best will rise, and the rest go elsewhere. It's the only way tobacco taxes will ever fall.