Orlik Dark Strong Kentucky query.

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
Hello tobacco experts, please excuse my ignorance here but after reading reviews of Orlik's DSK on tobaccoreviws.com I see that they state it is a non aromatic then go on to state that it's flavoured with liquorice.
I thought non aros had no added flavour so am puzzled.
I'm thinking of trying a tin anyway but thought I would ask first.
Also, how does it compare (if indeed it does) with Condor RR or LC?
Regards,
Jay.

 

beezer

Part of the Furniture Now
Jul 12, 2013
618
743
I'm smoking a bowl of some right now actually and the licorice is quite subtle in my opinion. I had the same concerns as you at one time and I think this is a really solid blend. I've got another seven tins in the cellar and feel confident this will age wonderfully!
I've never had RR or LC, so I'm of no help there. Go ahead and pick up a tin!

 
May 31, 2012
4,295
34
Also, how does it compare (if indeed it does) with Condor RR or LC?
Condor kills it.
DSK isn't really strong, the name is misleading, the flavor is okay but a bit on the sweetish side.
Condor is darker, deeper, and more dense.

 
Dec 24, 2012
7,195
456
There is a very faint anise flavour, and I mean very faint. You really have to look for it (or at least I do, but I am no supertaster). To me it tastes a bit like oatmeal with raisins, but not cloyingly so.

 

Chasing Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
43,445
109,364
That's like Black Frigate. It is soaked in rum, but is rum enhanced and not aromatic.

 

dadgy

Might Stick Around
Nov 13, 2015
78
1
I may be the outlier here, but the one tin of DSK that I've opened so far was so over run with anise/licorice that it was like lighting up a Mike and Ike's candy. To be fair, I had just finished a tin of Irish Flake, the the additional flavor may have been more pronounced to my palate at the time.

 

danhester

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jan 17, 2016
249
1
I thought non aros had no added flavour so am puzzled.
mawnansmiff: When it comes to flavoring with tobacco, I think of it as a continuum. It's hard for me to say there is a clear line separating aromatics and non-aromatics. Virtually all tobaccos have some flavoring added at some point, but at one end of the continuum, the flavoring is undetectable, and at the other end, you have full aromatics. And of course, everything in between. Many tobaccos commonly considered non-aromatic will have a lightly added flavor. DSK is one example, but also, you have navy flakes with a touch of rum. Even some "English" blends have an added flavoring, like the new Bengal Slices. I guess to me, the main difference between aros and non-aros is that with the former, the flavoring is the main attraction. With non-aros, the flavoring is used to compliment and accentuate certain aspects of the natural tobacco.
My own 2 cents, anyway....

 

danhester

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jan 17, 2016
249
1
Oh, and I like DSK! If you're interested, you should definitely give it a try. I can notice the flavoring, but it's subtle and well-applied in my shrewd judgment. I had some trouble keeping it lit for most of my tin, but I eventually figured out that it needs to be dryer than I thought. By the end of the tin, as it dried out more, it burned perfectly well for a flake.

 
Dec 24, 2012
7,195
456
dadgy, interesting comment. As I thought about it, all the DSK I have smoked has been old stuff from when it was sold previously. The only "young" stuff I have smoked is PH DSF, which I am told is really the same blend as DSK, but maybe that is wrong. The PH DSFI smoked all had at least 3 years of age.

 

deathmetal

Lifer
Jul 21, 2015
7,714
32
Irish Flake is like a delicious candy backed up by lovely strong tobacco. Wish they did not use whatever humectant makes its presence known in the early part of the bowl.

 

beastinview

Part of the Furniture Now
Jan 5, 2016
504
3
I typically describe blends where the flavoring is clearly dominant as aromatic. Those where the tobacco is clearly dominant I call non-aromatics. The weird between (Royal Yacht, et al.) are a bit more difficult to classify.

 

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
Mixed opinions as expected but thanks chaps. I may still give it a go but it has now drifted way down on my list. Am currently enjoying some Old Gowrie and Royal Yacht and rather nice they are too :puffy:
Regards,
Jay.

 
May 4, 2015
3,210
16
Royal Yacht has a pretty detectable Plum topping to my understanding, but an aromatic it is not.
The lines can get blurry, but the tobaccos you're talking about aren't approaching that line, in my opinion. :)

 

mso489

Lifer
Feb 21, 2013
41,210
60,459
Things get a little subtle deciding which are aromatics and which aren't. I think go with what you enjoy and don't split hairs. In general, I get less bite and more enjoyment out of non-aromatics (no flavorings at all), and sometimes problems with bite and burn with heavily or even just moderately flavored blends. But blends like Edward G. and Mac B's Modern Virginia are quite pleasant. It was nice to go to pipe shows and try things out, to see ... ahem. Over 95% of the pipe tobacco market is aromatics, so they're paying the freight.

 

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
It's a nice molasses-anise, it will dissipate after being held hostage in a jar for a few weeks. I love this stuff, love it. Smells like my grandfather used to, after smoking cigars. :worship:

 

markus

Part of the Furniture Now
Mar 18, 2014
770
489
Bloomfield, IN
Have you tried Mac Baren HH Old Dark Fired? It's very good as well, I think a lot of people compare it to St. Bruno. I think it tastes somewhat like St. Bruno but the flavoring seems a little more muted to me, it's still very good in it's own way though.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.