banner

Pipes Magazine » Pipe Tobacco Reviews

Search Forums  
   
Tags:  No tags yet. 

Jim's Amphora Burley Blend Review.

(22 posts)
  1. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 32,030

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The very woody, earthy, nutty, cocoa-ish burleys also sport some rugged savoriness. The savory aspect reminds me of aged burley. A small amount of woody, earthy, lightly spicy and sour, floral, dry and nutty, smoky dark fired Kentucky boosts up the blend in an important condimental role. The grassy, lightly citrusy, slightly floral Virginia is far in the background. There are no toppings as per Per Jensen (I always wanted to write that.). The strength is a couple of steps past the center of mild to medium, while the taste level almost reaches medium. The nic-hit is in the center of mild to medium. Won’t bite even when pushed, though it does have a rough edge at times. It’s not overly sweet, but the sweetness present is natural. A ready rubbed cut mixture that burns cool, clean and slightly slow with a very consistent flavor from start to finish that also translates to the lightly lingering after taste. Leaves little dampness in the bowl, and requires a little more than an average number of relights. Even though it has a bit of depth and body, it can an all day smoke if you wish.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  2. paulie66scandinavian

    Paul

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 3,048

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks, JimInks, this definitely sounds like a blend in accordance with my preferences, I must assume this is pretty close to A Original Brown minus oriental leaf,and good thing is this very burley is now available in several European countries as well,though a bit pricier than the Amphora regular line offerings,

    Paul The Scandinavian'
    Posted 1 month ago #
  3. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 32,030

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Paul: I think it's different enough from the Original to stand on its own. Spicier, less sweeter (the Original has toppings, this does not), with a bolder, more rugged flavor.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  4. mso489

    mso489

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 25,911

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    A Forums member sent me a sample of this from the Chicago pipe show, and jiminks review arrives just in time to whet my appetite after being off the pipe for a while because of a slow-to-heal bug. It sounds right up my street. Thank you for this excellently timed review!

    Posted 1 month ago #
  5. cigrmaster

    cigrmaster

    Preferred Member
    Joined: May 2012
    Posts: 13,648

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great review Jim, thanks for taking the time.

    Harris
    Posted 1 month ago #
  6. tennsmoker

    tennsmoker

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,189

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Jiminks: Thanks for another great review.
    Back in the day, I never did try the original Amphora. Don't know why. I just didn't. I think I was too caught up in smoking the big names in Virginia, Burley, Latakia and Orientals.
    I have now ordered two pouches of the new Amphora and will see if my thoughts and attitude have changed.


    The past is never dead. It's not even past--Requiem for a Nun
    Posted 1 month ago #
  7. judcole

    Jud

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 4,801

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Sounds like good stuff, Jim.

    Back in the day, I never did try the original Amphora. Don't know why. I just didn't.

    I was the same way, although I smoked a lot of Sail and Troost Special Cavendish when I was smoking drugstore blends. I've taken both the Original and Virginia into my rotation. Didn't care for Full Aroma, and the SRBC is not my sort of baccy.

    Thought in the early morning, solace in time of woes,
    Peace in the hush of the twilight, balm ere my eyelids close
    Rudyard Kipling
    Posted 1 month ago #
  8. seanv

    seanv

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 909

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks for the review. I’ll try it out on my next order along with the amphora Virginia

    Posted 1 month ago #
  9. paulie66scandinavian

    Paul

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 3,048

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    @JimInks, Thanks for the added information, much obliged

    Posted 1 month ago #
  10. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 32,030

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks for the kind words. I usually try not to offer opinions on tobaccos, and would rather let the reviews speak for themselves, but I do think this blend is worth trying. Also, I was told another entry in the Amphora line will be coming later this year, but I don't know anything about it as of now.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  11. mso489

    mso489

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 25,911

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    This thread illustrates once again that some of the presumably fuddy-duddy pouch blends are well in the running with premium tins if given a level-headed consideration.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  12. paulie66scandinavian

    Paul

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 3,048

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    +1 for the mso489, Mc Barens doing it again,,

    Posted 1 month ago #
  13. User has not uploaded an avatar

    holstein

    New Member
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 5

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    This is an OTC blend down here in Australia. Easy to find with Erinmore flake and Mixture

    Posted 1 month ago #
  14. mso489

    mso489

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 25,911

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I've enjoyed the Chicago pipe show sample right along, and still have a bowl or two left. I haven't stretched it, it was just a good sized sample. The flavor is first rate burley, and though the cut is fairly large, it burns well without any extra attention. If you like it, it is worth jarring a few pouches for safe keeping, which I may do, despite my stash.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  15. User has not uploaded an avatar

    bigpond

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Oct 2014
    Posts: 2,050

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Hey Jim, is there much family resemblance between this and hh burley flake?

    Posted 1 month ago #
  16. twangthang

    twangthang

    Senior Member
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Posts: 359

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks Jim. Happens I have a package of that a Lane Ready Rubbed on the way. Going to be a Burley weekend for me.
    Read your review on both and can’t wait to give them a try.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  17. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 32,030

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    BigPond: I wouldn't say there was. The HH Burley Flake is a little sweeter, less rugged, and a little milder. Both have a touch of dark fired Kentucky, but the Amphora has a tad more of it.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  18. paulie66scandinavian

    Paul

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 3,048

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I have come to the very same conclusion as JimiInks said when we are comparing HH Burley Flake by Mf Barens and Amphora Burley, in my view Both those are very tasty, dependable and high-quality everyday blends. Yet,All Amphoras are surprisingly good value tobaccies with high-quality leaf used in them, were these Amphoras sold in tins they'd go something like $ 9,99 for 1,75oz

    Posted 1 month ago #
  19. pappymac

    pappymac

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2015
    Posts: 1,815

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Sutliff sent the New Orleans Pipe Club some Amphora Burley to smoke and review which we did last Thursday. The overall consensus of those attending the meeting was that it was a pleasant smoke and that they would buy more.

    I kept sniffing the pouch and wondering where I had smelled something like this before. Then I opened a small sample of George Washington I had brought to share with another member. The Amphora Burley pouch note was very similar to the George Washington. Both had a cocoa aroma. I smoked both that night and felt that the George Washington (which was last made in the mid-1970s) was slightly lighter than the Amphora Burley. I imagine the original George Washington would be almost identical except for the addition of the Orientals in Amphora.

    One of our oldest members in age also said he found the Amphora Burley to be similar to the George Washington he remembers.

    I am glad we have a good admin and responsible moderators.

    Heave to you dark colored ship under sail! Prepare to be boarded!
    Posted 1 month ago #
  20. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 32,030

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I don't remember any dark fired in the GW blend like there is in the AB.

    Posted 4 weeks ago #
  21. mso489

    mso489

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 25,911

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Awfully good. If you like burley, you will very likely enjoy this.

    Posted 4 weeks ago #
  22. pappymac

    pappymac

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2015
    Posts: 1,815

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Jim -
    You are correct. GW did not have dark fired in it. I said it was similar based on the circa 1974 tin I bought a couple of years ago and jarred. I'm pretty sure the age has changed the flavor somewhat.

    I just found the pouch note to have the same cocoa aroma that I get from my jar of GW and the aroma and taste while smoking is similar to my palate.

    Posted 4 weeks ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.

 

 

    Back To Top  | Back to Forum Home Page

   Members Online Now
   disinformatique, fernafast, tobefrank