Is This a Charatan Reject?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
I spied this rather fetching estate Cherrywood on the pages of a particular Ebay seller that I occasionally frequent. It was advertised as a 'London Made Cherrywood Sitter' but in the more detailed information she said though it was marked as a reject she thought it to be made by the Charatan Company. The only nomenclature on the pipe is 'Reject' over 'London Made' as seen in picture #6.
It has some beautiful grain as can be seen but for the life of me I cannot see why it was stamped 'reject'. The only fault I can find (and I'm being picky here) is the draught hole is not perfectly central in the bowl.
What do the experts think, is this a known Charatan shape?
5x21-600x400.jpg

6x21-600x400.jpg

7x21-600x400.jpg

8x18-600x400.jpg

9x15-600x400.jpg

10x12-600x400.jpg

11x9-600x400.jpg

12x6-600x400.jpg

The length of the pipe by the way is 14cm or 5 1/2 inches.
Regards,
Jay.

 

dmcmtk

Lifer
Aug 23, 2013
3,672
1,685
What Owen said, Gilpin. See the upper left.
bcharatan3-432x600.jpg

http://www.pipepages.com/charatanpage2.htm

 

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
"how much did it cost you?"
Money and fair words George :puffy:
Thanks Owen and Dave. I didn't actually understand Owen's post until you showed the catalogue Dave. I did wonder if it was more 'poker' than 'cherrywood'. Interesting that of all the Charatan versions I have seen, they all have a saddle stem where of course mine is tapered. That said, I do wonder if mine has a replacement stem as it only fits snugly one way up suggesting it wasn't made at the same time as the pipe.
So if it is a Charatan what would make it a reject? I have to say it's a pretty smart looking pipe and now cleansed is a great smoker albeit with a faint aromatic ghost.
I'm rather hoping Ken stumbles upon this post, he might have more to say on the pipe whether a Charatan or not.
Many thanks chaps.
Regards,
Jay.

 

dmcmtk

Lifer
Aug 23, 2013
3,672
1,685
The only thing I'm noticing is the shank looks a little bit shorter than in the catalog image...

 

blendtobac

Lifer
Oct 16, 2009
1,237
213
The only thing I'm noticing is the shank looks a little bit shorter than in the catalog image...
That may be why it's a second. There may have been a flaw that popped up near the end of the shank when they were finishing it, so they trimmed a bit off.
Russ

 

wyfbane

Lifer
Apr 26, 2013
5,117
3,517
Tennessee
Jay likes being coy. He thinks it makes him look younger.
Nice pipe. I have a Charatan in that shape, but the stem is a little chewed.

 

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
"That may be why it's a second. There may have been a flaw that popped up near the end of the shank when they were finishing it, so they trimmed a bit off."
Cheers Dave and Russ. From my eyes it looks perfect (never seen another with full shank or no) and am delighted with the deal. For some reason I was the only bidder so got it at the start price :puffy:
George, it cost me the princely sum of £19.99 but please keep that under your hat :wink:
Wyfbane, does yours have a saddle stem?
Regards,
Jay.

 

wyfbane

Lifer
Apr 26, 2013
5,117
3,517
Tennessee
Jay, I will have to look. I am entertaining and just popped on for a moment.
Will get back to you on that, It may not.

 
May 4, 2015
3,210
16
That's a great looking pipe. I'd personally prefer the shorter shank with a saddle bit, so a bit of a combination of the two I guess.
Lovely, though.

 

kenbarnes

Can't Leave
Nov 12, 2015
441
374
Joan Nicholson, the sander at Charatan, who worked with Barry 1959-1978 and taught me sand-papering in 1976 (working next to her for six months) created this shape and showed it to my father and Dennis Marshall. They both liked it and asked her to give it a name. She told me that what she meant was Kipling and she forgot the name at the time and Gilpin emerged from her mouth and that's what they called it and made it into one of the catalogue shapes. Occasionally, you may see a 1970s freehand Gilpin pop up. These were hand made by Joan - her shape!

 

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
Snag, that's pretty much identical albeit with a full length shank. Ken, thanks for your input, you always educate us with your knowledge. So in your opinion was the seller correct in her assumption that it is a Charatan reject or do you think it to be a no name reject?
I gave it a thorough reaming last night (didn't look as though it needed it) and was surprised at how much carbon cake was removed. Now the faint aromatic ghost is virtually gone. Another surprise was an almost two hour smoke with FVF. The bowl is 20.27mm wide and 41.28mm deep so deceptively larger than it looks. It weighs in at 48.24g.
Regards,
Jay.

 

kenbarnes

Can't Leave
Nov 12, 2015
441
374
So in your opinion was the seller correct in her assumption that it is a Charatan reject or do you think it to be a no name reject?

Yes, it was turned in the Charatan factory and is a Charatan 'second'/reject. Charatan never stamped their name on rejects or seconds. From the mid 1960s their seconds, pipes with small flaws, were stamped Ben Wade and thirds were stamped with many different brand names like Mountbatten, Tinderbox (own label), Commodore, Mcquaid and so on and fourth grades were LM rejects (London made rejects). The names would change all the time but the shapes remained constant and can be recognised by the more knowledgeable pipe-smokers/collectors. There are many reasons why a pipe becomes a reject. This may have been, as mentioned before, a cut back or it has a very large flaw in the tobacco chamber which is then 'carbonised'/blackened or the countersink and 'face' was not drilled straight or the draft hole was wonky etc

 

mawnansmiff

Lifer
Oct 14, 2015
7,423
7,367
Sunny Cornwall, UK.
Many thanks for the additional info Ken. As I said mine has a draughthole that is off centre so that too likely contributed to it being rejected.
One interesting point is that I see member Pipestud sold a Charatan Gilpin back in May this year and he gives the weight at 44.5g. Mine with its truncated shank is heavier at 48.2g! I can only put this down to the tapered stem I have being possibly heavier than an original saddle stem.
Regards,
Jay.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.