Pipes Magazine » Pipe Tobacco Discussion

Search Forums  
   
Tags:  No tags yet. 

Group Tasting - Laurel Flake and St. James Flake

(61 posts)
  • Started 1 month ago by ashdigger
  • Latest reply from mtwaller
  1. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Okay folks I'm going to conduct another group tasting experience. I'm going to have a total of 10 spaces, and 2 already are spoken for. So I need 8 more victims tasters.

    The Laurel Flake is dated 1-12-05 and the St. James Flake is from 2014.

    Rumor has it they are both the same tobacco (go to tobaccoreviews.com)

    It was originally blended for Tavern Tobacco Co, but is no longer made. So technically its unobtainium.

    So, here's how it works. PM me you name and address and I'll send you a sample of both. Taste them and report your findings to this thread.

    I understand shit happens, but if you're leaving town, going to prison, have a big event coming up....don't ask for a sample. I'm generous, but don't ruin a fun thing by acting like an irresponsible 10 yr old.

    Finally, I'd like to thank donjgiles for turning me onto this great unobtainable.

    Ubi Ignis Est?
    Posted 1 month ago #
  2. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    7 spaces left

    Posted 1 month ago #
  3. bluegrassbrian

    bluegrassbrian

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2016
    Posts: 1,779

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Pee Emm sent.

    Tobacco's a help because it clears the mind
    But like all your friends it is vilified
    They always say, the right amount's fine
    Posted 1 month ago #
  4. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    5 spaces left

    Posted 1 month ago #
  5. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    4 spaces left

    Posted 1 month ago #
  6. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    3 spaces left.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  7. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    2 spaces left

    Posted 1 month ago #
  8. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    1 space left

    Posted 1 month ago #
  9. scloyd

    scloyd

    Senior Member
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 1,507

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    My palate is not that refined so I would be a waste of a space. Sounds like a good idea though. Looking forward to reading the results.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  10. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Okay, we have the tasters!! I'll crack the jars today and get the tobacco out. I'll post pictures of the tobacco.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  11. rdavid

    Panhandler

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 682

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Really looking forward to this as a way to kick off my "Virginia" summer.

    Definitely not a refined palate here either but hoping I can contribute a less experienced point of view.

    "May my last breath be drawn through a pipe, and exhaled in a jest." Charles Lamb
    Posted 1 month ago #
  12. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks, ashdigger! I love VaPer’s, I’m very excited to try these out.

    “There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion”.
    Posted 1 month ago #
  13. d4k23

    d4k23

    Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 284

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    So what's the best way to compare two tobaccos? Light two similar pipes with the two baccys and puff a few times on one, then the other? Smoke one full bowl of one, then the other while senses are fresh? I'm think two at the same time, but curious what others will do as well. Thanks Ash for letting me be a part of your experiment!

    Posted 1 month ago #
  14. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    d4k23 I was honestly wondering the same thing. I have a couple pipes that mainly see use from Va or Va/Per blends, I’m thinking smoking out of two different pipes would be better than smoking one right after another in the same pipe? I’m planning on trying one, then waiting a few hours and drinking lots of water to cleanse the old palette before trying the other. I could be dead wrong, though. Never done a comparative tasting, myself.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  15. didimauw

    didimauw

    Mod
    Joined: Jul 2013
    Posts: 2,693

    online

    Login to Send PM

    Brand new corn cobs of course!

    Posted 1 month ago #
  16. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Ah, the trusty cob. I don’t own any... I guess I’ll have to pick up a few. That makes sense!

    Posted 1 month ago #
  17. jpmcwjr

    jpmcwjr

    Preferred Member
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 12,574

    online

    Login to Send PM

    Freshly purged briars are just fine, and have some advantages over a new cob.

    And, yes, loading two pipes, making sure the tobaccos are at the same moisture level, and alternating say for five minutes each seems a good start.

    I know that you believe you understood what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
    Posted 1 month ago #
  18. hawky454

    hawky454

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 2,602

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I’m looking forward to trying these and sharing my thoughts with you all. I just happen to be the mysterious 10th spot.

    Thanks again, Ash, for including me.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  19. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Sorry for the delay gents. I wanted all my ducks in a row before I sent them out. They'll go out in Monday's Post.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  20. rdavid

    Panhandler

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 682

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    2 brand new cobs at the ready here. Going to load and smoke two at a time for my first bowls of the day, alternating between bowls every few minutes or so. Than later that day, going to smoke full bowls of each separately to determine any differences.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  21. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Ok, I finally got a breather. 16 fires in two weeks has kicked my ass.

    ALL PACKAGES ARE MAILED.

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  22. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Here is what the Laurel Flake looks like

    This is the St. James

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  23. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 30,832

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    They look delicious.

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  24. d4k23

    d4k23

    Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 284

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks Ashdigger, those do look like good flakes. Pretty excited to do a comparison, test my palate out against other forum members!

    Did they smell the same out of the tin?

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  25. rdavid

    Panhandler

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 682

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I have two brand new cobs at the ready. Would it be advisable to smoke them with another Virginia first, say FVF or something like that to season the cobs first?

    I do get a different flavor from the first bowl or two from a new cob and don’t want to risk skewing the results. Thanks.

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  26. bassbug

    bassbug

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Dec 2016
    Posts: 895

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    yay..I'm sure I'll be the last to receive the stash up here in Canada, but I"m certainly looking forward to it.

    I don't care who you are, you're not walking on the water while I'm fishing
    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  27. donjgiles

    donjgiles

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Apr 2018
    Posts: 613

    online

    Login to Send PM

    How was the moisture level on the Laurel Flake?
    It sure is sparklie!!!

    Visually, ten extra years make a difference. The St. James looks much darker over all to me.

    Also, the crystal structure is interesting as it only occurs on certain types of lighter virginias.

    Don

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  28. jpmcwjr

    jpmcwjr

    Preferred Member
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 12,574

    online

    Login to Send PM

    I have two brand new cobs at the ready. Would it be advisable to smoke them with another Virginia first, say FVF or something like that to season the cobs first?

    I do get a different flavor from the first bowl or two from a new cob and don’t want to risk skewing the results. Thanks.

    Sounds like a good plan.

    Two refreshed briars are equally good.

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  29. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Did they smell the same out of the tin?

    They do not smell the same. One is very stewy/figgy and the other had a slight astringent plum, almost fermented smell.

    I have smoked a bowl of each and I definitely prefer one of them over the other. They are very similar, but also very different.

    The cut of the flakes is different too. One is very thin and the other slightly, but noticeably thicker.

    If this all seems a little cloak and dagger, I'm trying to keep you fine folks from developing confirmation bias, while still giving hints of what you can expect.

    Posted 2 weeks ago #
  30. hawky454

    hawky454

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 2,602

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Beautiful pictures! Just now seeing them. Just got my samples in the mail today, here are some pics.


    Thanks again, ashdigger, I’ll be getting started on this right away!

    They do not smell the same. One is very stewy/figgy and the other had a slight astringent plum, almost fermented smell.

    As far as bag note goes, I completely agree with this! The smell is certainly making my mouth water! I can’t wait.

    Posted 1 week ago #
  31. hawky454

    hawky454

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 2,602

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I’m also going to note that while I am familiar with St. Jame’s Flake, it’s been awhile since I’ve had it, as I’m waiting for my oldest stash to reach 6 years before I start smoking it again, by that time I’ll have a nice cycle of it going so I can always smoke it aged, obviously I prefer SJF with some years on it. I’m also going to refrain from looking at the TR of Laurel Flake until I am done with my taste tests, I don’t want to be influenced by any one reviewer. There is plenty of tobacco of both blends to experiment in different pipes and what not so it may take me a few days before I post my thoughts on it. All of that said, let the games begin... I’m giddy!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  32. User has not uploaded an avatar

    csharp

    Member
    Joined: Dec 2015
    Posts: 109

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Samples came in the mail today. Looking forward to this tasting.

    Posted 1 week ago #
  33. bluegrassbrian

    bluegrassbrian

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2016
    Posts: 1,779

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Mine came too.. both look delicious.
    Ill do a bowl of the St James tomorrow and make some notes.

    For only having around 5 years of age it sure looks dark and funky!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  34. hawky454

    hawky454

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 2,602

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Just got done with my first bowl of Laurel Flake, won’t give anything away but I will say, hot damn, it is GOOD!!!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  35. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Did the postal employees smoke everyone else's baccy?

    Posted 1 week ago #
  36. donjgiles

    donjgiles

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Apr 2018
    Posts: 613

    online

    Login to Send PM

    I received mine yesterday and had a delicious bowl of St. James Flake. Thank you Ash. Comparison to follow.

    Don

    Posted 1 week ago #
  37. d4k23

    d4k23

    Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 284

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The baccy has not made it this far south yet! Hopefully today! Looking forward to trying these out!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  38. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I just got mine in the mail! I haven’t tried them yet, I’m hoping to do so either tonight or tomorrow. I will say, the St. James smells absurdly good. As far as the tin note is concerned, that one gets my vote. I’m interested to see how the actual tastes will compare...

    Posted 1 week ago #
  39. bouwser

    bouwser

    Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 252

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Still waiting on mine. Today maybe?

    Posted 1 week ago #
  40. bluegrassbrian

    bluegrassbrian

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2016
    Posts: 1,779

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I’m about 3/4 through my first bowl of Laurel flake.
    Now I’m confident that if it’s not relabeled St James flake, it’s not too far off. Hard to know for sure considering the difference in age. The Laurel Flake in and of itself is a superb smoke having had over 14 years of age to mature and transform.

    I’ve also been smoking a recently opened tin of FVF from 2007, so all in all, cousins to be sure.

    I’ve always found St James flake to essentially be Full Virginia Flake with a careful addition of aromatic Perique. I’ve been curious about what kind d of Perique Gawith uses in their blends. It’s never too spicy or peppery and never too plummy/raisin/sweet. Instead I find it to be an old world incense flavor, almost like an oriental once it has been given some years to age.
    For me, this is apparent in both samples provided.

    Again, if I had to make a guess I’d say they are the same blends with a Virginia to Perique ratio no different than +/- 5%.
    Really excellent stuff. Thanks so much for the opportunity Ash!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  41. d4k23

    d4k23

    Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 284

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Tobacco came in yesterday! Bag note was pretty much the same, probably because the tobacco was hanging together for so long. I could smell it through the envelope, I got the figgy goodness, but a little duller than I would guess straight out of the tin. Both flakes were pretty moist. I'm sure it's heresy, but I'll be cube cutting both, give them both some dry time, because they are pliable flakes, for the first smoke later today. Will report later on!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  42. d4k23

    d4k23

    Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 284

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Just got done smoking and will share my thoughts. I went ahead and went with two pipes of similar smoking capabilities. The Laurel Flake was in the Karl Erik and the SJF was in the Winslow Crown. Both tobaccos cube cut. The Laurel took to the flame very easy, and the SJF had to be coaxed (as is my experience with FVF/SG). I smoked one bowl for a few minutes, then switched. I was drinking water and sniffing coffee beans in between to cleanse my palate. Here are my thoughts on both:

    Laurel Flake: First char and puff was full of flavor! I immediately got the stewed fruit, and maybe like a flower like notes. Not herbal, but a sweetish scent. The sweetness lasted throughout the entire bowl, and every now and again I would get a sour/tang (what I think of MC's nice aged Virginia). Every relight was spot on, never any charred notes. The after taste was lighter and had me wanting more.

    SJF: Full body smoke once I got this lit. It had the traditional SG mouth feel, with a little bite if I pushed it. Smoking this I got more woody/earth notes, but there was still the aged Virginia goodness that was the back bone. Slightly sweet at times, a little less than the Laurel Flake. The second half of the bowl I believe the Perique kicked in and I got a little spice to it. The second half of this bowl took a little more work to keep lit and the flavors became more full.

    After a couple of back and forth, I noticed that the in between lights were very similar, as if I was lighting the same smoke. Even the non-lit draw seemed the same at times. But that Laurel had just that little more sweetness to it than the SJF throughout the entire bowl, and the SJF a little more woodsy.

    My thoughts are that these are two very similar tobaccos, maybe the same, but I think the Laurel has some extra casing/topping that added the touch of sweetness. And the tang showed more in the Laurel. Both excellent smokes, and smoking both together gave me a very nice nic buzz I am enjoying while I type (one I don't get often, ha)!

    Thanks Ash for the opportunity! Can't wait to here what everyone else thought!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  43. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 30,832

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I think they are basically the same blend; always did. The Laurel Flake has a little more of a stewed fruitness and fermentation that was likely enhanced by the aging process. I tried a small sample a few years back and thought the same thing then, only I noticed a dab of cocoa back then that I don't notice in this batch. I never could explain that. I do think now, as I did then, that a light sweet essence was added to the Laurel Flake, probably sugar. What very small differences between the two were, aging has pumped up those minor changes a mite.

    Either way, I've been very happy to compare them, and I appreciate the opportunity, Ash Digger. Thanks a bunch, man!

    Posted 1 week ago #
  44. donjgiles

    donjgiles

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Apr 2018
    Posts: 613

    online

    Login to Send PM

    My 2 cents...
    I think they are very similar, after all they are both pure Va/Per flakes from the same blender.

    I do think the blends of virginias differ with St. James having more dark virginias and Laurel having a bit more medium and bright leaf. Laurel tastes sweeter whereas the St. James sweetness is more dark. There may be a difference in length of steaming and pressing, but I really do not know.

    I also believe the Perique used is different, as I recall the reason for creating the Laurel Flake in the first place was to use a "special" batch of perique that Knoxville Cigar had aquired.

    I am glad you all are enjoying it, thank you again Ash for your generousity.

    Don

    Posted 1 week ago #
  45. hawky454

    hawky454

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 2,602

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Well I guess I’ll just go ahead and post my thoughts as well.

    First of all I’d like to thank Ash for including me in this generous offer. I’ve never done anything quite like this and I’m thankful for the opportunity.

    First 3 pipes full I smoked each blend by themselves and not back to back. Fully rubbed out both flakes and let dry for 15 to 30 mins, I smoked outdoors in 70° F weather, slightly breezy, sunny and always after a moderately sized meal. Smoked in a BB Stanwell 190 pipe that is reserved for VA & VaPer blends. When comparing in this manner (memory) I came to the conclusion that these two blends are identical and the only perceived differences noted were subject to the 10 years of difference between the LF & SJF. Personally, I preferred the SJF as it was slightly more sharp and not as mellowed by age as the LF at this point.

    Next I smoked both blends back to back in similarly shaped pipes with chambers nearly identical and both pipes dedicated to the VA genre. This time I smoked indoors right after a large dinner. Conclusion, yes, I agree with basically everyone that these two blends are the same. At this point, I still can’t decide on a winner, some smokes I think I prefer the SJF but other times I prefer the LF but the differences are so minor that I really could’t tell them apart in a blind taste test. Both were absolutely stellar smokes and I can’t wait till my stash of SJF hits the 5 yr mark. I still have some left of both blends for a few more bowls and I shall cherish the rest this stuff.

    Posted 1 week ago #
  46. bouwser

    bouwser

    Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 252

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks Ash, received mine yesterday. It snowed something fierce today. I’ll get to the experimentation when I can get outside.

    Posted 1 week ago #
  47. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    These reviews look exactly like I figured, based on my thoughts about these two similar/dissimilar/same blends.

    Posted 1 week ago #
  48. hawky454

    hawky454

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2016
    Posts: 2,602

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Twas double the fun! And a reminder of how much I love SJF and we don’t really need to be sad that Laurel Flake is no longer made.

    Does anyone here have anymore experience with the other Tavern Tobacco Co. made by SG?

    Posted 1 week ago #
  49. bassbug

    bassbug

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Dec 2016
    Posts: 895

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Still waiting for my package to arrive here in the great white north. I've never tasted either one of the blends, so I'm looking forward to seeing if I can add anything to the conversation.

    Posted 1 week ago #
  50. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Both of these are fantastic, thanks again for letting us partake of these fine tobaccos. If I didn’t know anything about them, just from a visual standpoint I would not have thought they were even close to the same. They look quite different to my eye! The aroma was also quite different. The SJF smells darker, fruitier, tangier... the Laurel smells lightly bready and sweet. I imagine this is a product of the significant aging. I will say after smoking small bowls of each side by side, and then a bit more of each one at a time, I distinctly prefer the SJF! It tastes fuller, tangier, maybe a bit sharper. The laurel is very balanced and smooth, but that many years of aging has taken something out of it, perhaps? I’ve never tried either brand new so I can’t confirm that. But the SJF is much more satisfying to me. Even after tasting them both, they differ enough that I wouldn’t know they were the same blend. I wonder if they would match up more closely if they both had the same age on them? Either way, I genuinely enjoy these. Thanks so much for letting me participate in this tasting, I want more of that St. James now!!

    Posted 6 days ago #
  51. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 30,832

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Mtwaller: I noticed in the past that on occasion that the color of SJF is a little lighter than it is most of the time, much like the color of Laurel Flake. It's not common, but I have seen it.

    Posted 6 days ago #
  52. bazungu

    bazungu

    Member
    Joined: Feb 2018
    Posts: 103

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The tobacco arrived safe and well here in Edinburgh, Scotland(surprisingly quick!!)! Thanks again Ashdigger for giving us this opportunity to taste these delicious tobaccos.
    I have already smoked a pipe of the Laurel Flake and I was blown away. In a few days I will post a write up of both tobaccos! Cannot wait to try the st james flake tomorrow...

    Posted 6 days ago #
  53. bouwser

    bouwser

    Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 252

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Again, I want to thank Ash. These tobaccos are superb. Here is my 2 cents.

    I do believe they are the same or just about as close as you can get. The aging has some effect, but all the flavors are there in both. I am not going to be on the search for more St. James flake. I have to have more......TAD, feed the TAD!

    My notes:
    Laurel
    -sweet lasting the bowl, red VA style
    -I did get some cocoa on the light a few time (was this psychosomatic?)
    -lots of deep fruitiness
    -soft flavors (much like a pinot noir has or a really well made European Pilsner)
    -bit o honey especially when sipped.

    St. James
    -rugged
    -more plumness (perique?)
    -a least once with the cocoa note on a light
    -big flavor (if sticking with alcohol metaphors, Zinfandel or cab sav or a really in your face hoppy beer)

    Posted 5 days ago #
  54. bassbug

    bassbug

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Dec 2016
    Posts: 895

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Finally got my envelope, thanks Ash...

    I just finished the first bowl of Laurel Flake, so I'll give my impressions. Please keep in mind that I am a dedicated aromatic smoker and this is the first VaPer I've ever tried.

    This was like when you're not paying attention and top falls off the pepper shaker onto your food...The first thing that hit me was the pepper taste. Not just a hint, not a bit but full blown black pepper. It took almost a third of the bowl for my taste buds to not scream at me. After that I did start noticing some of the Virginia coming through. Slight citrus and grassy but it was, for me, completely overpowered by the perique. I"m not sure whether this blend is considered light, medium of heavy on the perique content but if it was cut in half, even two thirds I think I would enjoy it a lot more. I didn't detect any topping flavours but then again, it may be because of the powerful spicy taste the dominated.

    Being a one bowl a day (max) smoker, I'll try the St. James tomorrow and see what it offers.

    Posted 5 days ago #
  55. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I have to update my initial findings: the first couple flakes of Laurel were a bit loose, but this last one now that I’m really looking hard at it does look remarkably similar to the St. James. Now that I have gotten my first few experiences out of the way, I am also starting to notice the similarities in taste more apparently. Admittedly, I don’t have an ultra-refined palette. I think I was picking up strongly on the differences before, but now I can see how there is some distinct sameness to them. I’ll admit that my first assessment was probably off, for the experienced smoker (which I am not) most people would probably know these to be the same or nearly the same tobacco. I think the different flavor profiles that resulted from extensive aging of one versus the other threw me for a loop. I still prefer the St. James, but holy damn is that Laurel silky smooth and sweet. Thanks again, Ashdigger! I love the VaPer’s I’ve tried, this makes me keen to start cellaring some of the better ones.

    Posted 4 days ago #
  56. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great reviews!! I'm stoled all the samples survived shipment. Not bad considering the envelopes were a tad thick, one was shipped to Canada and another to Scotland.

    Posted 4 days ago #
  57. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    *stoked

    Posted 4 days ago #
  58. donjgiles

    donjgiles

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Apr 2018
    Posts: 613

    online

    Login to Send PM

    Are you going to share your impressions Ash?

    Don

    Posted 4 days ago #
  59. ashdigger

    ashdigger

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 4,992

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    There is still one or left to review, but yes, I wrote my review two weeks ago. I'll just cut and paste out of the word doc.

    Posted 4 days ago #
  60. bazungu

    bazungu

    Member
    Joined: Feb 2018
    Posts: 103

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    This week I will do another tasting session and I will post my findings as well, they seem to differ a bit from others.

    Posted 4 days ago #
  61. mtwaller

    mtwaller

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 229

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Alright. I’m going to put my foot in my mouth one last time. It seems I should’ve waited until I smoked every speck of Ashdigger’s generous supply of aged tobacco before I let fly with my web warrior verdict on these. I had enough left for a half bowl of Laurel (I’m smoking it out of a Pete 120, so half bowl is still a solid amount). I swear to god that last flake was the most delicious, nuanced, flavorful bowl I’ve ever smoked. The sweetness was almost too good, I kept getting waves of what to me tasted like ripe tangerine. Call me crazy, but that’s the only taste I could compare it to. I don’t think I smoked enough at once to fully let the flavors develop until now. 14-15 year Laurel kicks ass and it is honestly better than the St. James, even though my initial bias didn’t want to let me believe it. Final answer. That Laurel is GOOD.

    Posted 16 hours ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.

 

 

    Back To Top  | Back to Forum Home Page

   Members Online Now
   mso489, aldecaker, donjgiles, papawhisky, elpfeife, sablebrush52, didimauw, jpmcwjr, pitchfork, sigbullet, morgansteele, madox07, marc75, seanv, npod, philairfoil, daniel7