Wondering why more people don't feel the love for this blend.
Yesterday I received a package that contained, among other things, 2 oz each of PS Luxury Twist Flake and GH BB #2. (As a side note, these are the extreme opposite ends of the "pretty" scale as flakes go.) This morning for my first bowl of the day I tried some BB #2 in an MM CG. To put it mildly, I've never been attracted to any blend on first bowl as I was with this. Without getting into a full-blown review (which wouldn't be fair with only 1 bowl) here's some initial thoughts:
- Typical GH blend, quite damp
- No, as in NONE, of the expected Lakeland scent. I do wonder how people can get a vinegar and strong floral scent off this.
- Rubs out quite nicely with a few broken pieces of flake.
- Lit easily after a couple of slight charring lights, and held fire well throughout the whole bowl.
- Exceptionally slow burn and cool smoke, even considering it was in a cob.
- Faint taste of Lakeland in the background, behind nice sweet Virginias and classic Burleys changing through the bowl, with the floral taste appearing faintly occasionally.
- Burned easily 'till foul tasting wet dottle was burning, and not much of that left.
So this blend only has 56 reviews on TR.com with 41 of them being 3 or 4 *. I can't understand why it doesn't have a bigger following!
While I know taste is very subjective, the difference in views on TR would indicate to me people seem to be smoking different tobaccos. Does anyone put any thoughts into the claims of poor quality control by GH? I would like to hear from people who have bought this several times over a period of time to get their views on the claims.
As noted above, upon opening the bag, there is no evidence of the Lakeland scent but I did get a faint sweetness, something like rum, but different, that carried over pleasantly to the smoke. Just faint though and not enough to call it an aromatic.
I can assure you there will be copious quantities of this to be jarred for aging.
Yesterday I received a package that contained, among other things, 2 oz each of PS Luxury Twist Flake and GH BB #2. (As a side note, these are the extreme opposite ends of the "pretty" scale as flakes go.) This morning for my first bowl of the day I tried some BB #2 in an MM CG. To put it mildly, I've never been attracted to any blend on first bowl as I was with this. Without getting into a full-blown review (which wouldn't be fair with only 1 bowl) here's some initial thoughts:
- Typical GH blend, quite damp
- No, as in NONE, of the expected Lakeland scent. I do wonder how people can get a vinegar and strong floral scent off this.
- Rubs out quite nicely with a few broken pieces of flake.
- Lit easily after a couple of slight charring lights, and held fire well throughout the whole bowl.
- Exceptionally slow burn and cool smoke, even considering it was in a cob.
- Faint taste of Lakeland in the background, behind nice sweet Virginias and classic Burleys changing through the bowl, with the floral taste appearing faintly occasionally.
- Burned easily 'till foul tasting wet dottle was burning, and not much of that left.
So this blend only has 56 reviews on TR.com with 41 of them being 3 or 4 *. I can't understand why it doesn't have a bigger following!
While I know taste is very subjective, the difference in views on TR would indicate to me people seem to be smoking different tobaccos. Does anyone put any thoughts into the claims of poor quality control by GH? I would like to hear from people who have bought this several times over a period of time to get their views on the claims.
As noted above, upon opening the bag, there is no evidence of the Lakeland scent but I did get a faint sweetness, something like rum, but different, that carried over pleasantly to the smoke. Just faint though and not enough to call it an aromatic.
I can assure you there will be copious quantities of this to be jarred for aging.