Pipes Magazine » Pipe Tobacco Reviews

Search Forums  
   
Tags:  No tags yet. 

First Impression: 1792

(26 posts)
  • Started 7 months ago by jaytex969
  • Latest reply from mso489
  1. jaytex969

    jaytex969

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jun 2017
    Posts: 3,483

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I've had this sack of 1792 from Saltedplug's sale for a while.

    While digging around for something new to try (and to keep my mind off of the Secret Santa stash) I pulled the bag open and took a whiff.

    As I've stated many times, I don't get tin notes very well. I did get a vaguely vanilla-ish sensation, but far from the "kitchen" variety.

    Heeding everyone's ghosting concerns, I chose the trusty "beater" pipe, a $10 eBay Baraccini smooth apple that usually performs well. It's had all kinds of stuff through it, so this impression may be tainted. I most often smoke VA/Bur's and "Lakeland-y" things in it. Never Latakia, though.

    The tobacco is aged, although I don't recall how long Salted said he'd had it. From the large ziplock, it feels slightly moist but much drier that the average SG product at opening. Perfect for immediate use, in my opinion.

    I took my fingers and held back the larger pieces and allowed the smaller stuff to fall to the bottom, which was used to fill the beater pipe.

    It took several lights to get going. Initially, I was not getting much flavor.

    Eventually, a cigar-like note emerged and the tonquin essence soon followed. Along with the tonquin, or maybe even as part of it (as I am new to this component), there was a slightly anise, tongue numbing effect. It was mild and complimented the ensemble. The vanilla note, again, was not as you might find in the kitchen, but much "drier", as in no real sweetness to speak of.

    (Intermission: For the sake of science, I've loaded up a second bowl. I hope I don't regret it!)

    On lighting bowl #2, I am reminded a bit of my first experience with Peterson Irish Whiskey, which I somewhat jokingly dubbed my favorite vanilla tobacco after my first smoke. In keeping with the Peterson theme, the aforementioned anise component is reminiscent of University Flake.

    A little Virginia sweetness is hidden in there, but one could overlook it. This is definitely NOT a sweet tobacco, which is a nice change. The burley is burley, not so nutty, but very much all business.

    If tobaccos were people, these two guys would be the tough guys from the 30's, "interrogating" you in an alley. As tough as they are, there IS a smoothness to the whole affair. No bite, no harshness, and that ever present dry vanilla tonquin. I'm sure the age of this batch has toned that down a bit, which is fine with me.

    The slightest gurgle was removed with a single pass about a third of the way through bowl #1 and bowl #2 has not required any such attention. Halfway through the second bowl, I can feel Lady Nic sneaking up behind me and I have gone to refill my ice water jug.

    The periodic quick relight has kept an even coal going and the briar, even through the second round, has stayed comfortably warm.

    Some of the reviews mentioned a "creaminess", which I often don't get, but the second half of bowl 2 has met this description. With the tonquin, there is the slightest custard quality waaay in the distance. Shoving my nose over the glowing ember confirms a still cigar-like essence that may disperse those bothersome family members, if needed.

    This tobacco makes me think of how a neighborhood pool hall might have smelled in the 40's, with men in pinstriped suits and suspenders, rolling up their sleeves for the break. No skinny jeans allowed....

    As the final bits ignite, a single hiccup lets me know that my work here is done. If you like burley, cigars, savory essences and can brave the tonquin, I suggest you give this a whirl.

    Verdict: Get Some!

    Gunner, Black Frigate. Say "Hello" to my little friend!
    Posted 7 months ago #
  2. npod

    npod

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jun 2017
    Posts: 2,705

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Awesome review, Jay! No skinny jeans allowed - that quote sums it up nicely.

    Neal
    Posted 7 months ago #
  3. anthonyrosenthal74

    anthonyrosenthal74

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jan 2013
    Posts: 7,488

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Verdict: Get Some!
    That video kills me every time I see it The blend sounds interesting. I may have to try it soon.

    Arrrrr, shiver me timbers! International Talk Like a Pirate Day is September the 19th!!!
    Brothers Of The Black Frigate
    Posted 7 months ago #
  4. madox07

    madox07

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Dec 2016
    Posts: 1,317

    online

    Login to Send PM

    Man I am so tempted, although the tonquin is the reason I am skeptical. I never liked that spice, and I am afraid I would get the tin perhaps for a bowl or two and the rest will end up forgotten in a jar or something.

    Sea Wolf Pipers

    "Like the mariners of old, a loner is acceptable but a pipe is best enjoyed in a pack"
    Posted 7 months ago #
  5. chasingembers

    Embers

    Captain Of The Black Frigate
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 15,362

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Had it ever been jarred? Could have lost some of its potency being only in the bag for that long. 1792 is one I like to go big with. This big Ben Wade is dedicated to it. But sadly I got no nic hit once again.

    Damnation seize my soul if I give you quarters, or take any from you.
    -Edward Teach
    Posted 7 months ago #
  6. workman

    workman

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jan 2018
    Posts: 1,703

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Nice review. I like 1792 and its unflavored brother Lakeland Dark. He is the ugly guy with the scars and the tommy gun, where 1792 is the pin striped smooth talker.

    Smoking is one of the leading causes of all statistics.
    Posted 7 months ago #
  7. timt

    timt

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jul 2018
    Posts: 1,037

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Nice review Jay. This one of the blends I've seriously eyeballed but not tried yet. You may have just talked me in to giving it a whirl.

    Tim
    Posted 7 months ago #
  8. mityahicks

    mityahicks

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 170

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I would have a tin if not for everyone's TAD snatching it up so quickly.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  9. jaytex969

    jaytex969

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jun 2017
    Posts: 3,483

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Cap'n, I'm pretty sure it was jarred until sold and shipped to me.

    I remember Salted trying to unload the multiple cases of mason jars after his tobacco sale.

    All of the stuff I got in bulk from him went back into jars. Some odds & ends bags, like this one, I kept out to play with. I bought one or two of the "sampler mixes", as well as a few bulks.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  10. weezell

    weezell

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 9,272

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I LOVE the stuff!...

    "the weez"...
    Posted 6 months ago #
  11. cosmicfolklore

    Cosmic

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2013
    Posts: 18,162

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Good review. 1792 is good stuff. I might suggest GH&co Dark Flake unscented and Black Twist sliced as other you might enjoy trying.

    Michael
    Posted 6 months ago #
  12. saltedplug

    saltedplug

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2016
    Posts: 1,913

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Yes, the 1792 aged 5 years in jars.

    Great review Jay, and well-written.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  13. jaytex969

    jaytex969

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jun 2017
    Posts: 3,483

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks, Salted.

    Cosmic, I'm all over the Dark Flake Unscented. I could smoke nothing but that and be happy. I haven't had the Black Twist Sliced, although I have Black Irish X and Brown Irish X. Are they close?

    Posted 6 months ago #
  14. civilwar

    civilwar

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 1,346

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great review, thanks for posting.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  15. wyfbane

    wyfbane

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 4,180

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    1792 is the only tobacco I ever actively disliked. Your review has reminded me that it has been 5 years and I need to try it again to see if it more palatable.

    Thanks!

    Posted 6 months ago #
  16. spartacus

    spartacus

    Senior Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 509

    online

    Login to Send PM

    Great review Jay. Very thorough! P&C is out so I put my name n the notify list.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  17. krizzose

    krizzose

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 995

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Like wyfbane, I did not like it when I tried it, to put it mildly. It has sat undisturbed in a jar for 6 years; it might be worth another try.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  18. enrikon

    enrikon

    New Member
    Joined: Dec 2018
    Posts: 43

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Very good tobacco, but - like Brown No. 4, Dark Flake, Lakeland Dark, etc ... - too strong for me. These tobaccos, unfortunately, I have precluded myself.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  19. bradical

    bradical

    Junior Member
    Joined: Dec 2018
    Posts: 62

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thank you for the thoughtful review. This is definitely on my must try list.

    Don't go chasing waterfalls.
    Posted 6 months ago #
  20. kola

    kola

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Apr 2014
    Posts: 596

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    If I could stomach past the tin-note - get a bowl packed without puking - and somehow put a match to it, I'd like to try it someday. But no can do. The stuff is nasty

    Good review though !

    I treat people the way they treat me. It's that simple.
    Posted 6 months ago #
  21. seanv

    seanv

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 909

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I picked up 4 oz of this a few weeks ago, apparently aged 5 or so years. I haven’t tried it yet. The flakes are almost grey in colour and are covered in white crystals. I do not smell an of the Aromatic topping. I plan to smoke a small bowl as a tester tomorrow after work. Hopefully it’s as good as the review makes it sound.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  22. kcghost

    kcghost

    Preferred Member
    Joined: May 2011
    Posts: 2,340

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Its one of those love it or hate it tobaccos. Personally I love the stuff.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  23. onestrangeone

    onestrangeone

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Sep 2015
    Posts: 664

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I picked up a fair amount of this from Salted’s sale as well, love it!

    Posted 6 months ago #
  24. yaddy306

    yaddy306

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2013
    Posts: 1,215

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I'm not sure if it was the tonquin or the nicotine, but 1792 made me nauseous. It's not for me.

    Posted 6 months ago #
  25. leafsmoker

    leafsmoker

    Member
    Joined: Oct 2017
    Posts: 279

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Absolutely love the 1792. i Agree it is either a love or hate it blend.

    The walls have ears, the windows have eyes, and the wise man tells no lies.
    You can offer someone a cigar, but you can never offer someone your pipe.
    Posted 6 months ago #
  26. mso489

    mso489

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 25,911

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I gave some to a pipe friend with one or two other blends. He liked the others, never commented on 1792. So I assume it wasn't pleasing.

    Posted 6 months ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.

 

 

    Back To Top  | Back to Forum Home Page

   Members Online Now
   greeneyes, madox07, mrenglish, cigrmaster, spartacus, danimalia, alaskanpiper, condorlover1, tkcolo, jpmcwjr, canadianpuffer, mngslvs, donjgiles