"Cellar or Smoke?" Clarification

Brian:
I appreciated the shout-out on this week's podcast. But I think you misunderstood my suggestion for a segment I was calling "Cellar or Smoke?" You may still not like the idea but I just wanted to clarify what I meant.
I was picturing a segment that would look at new tobacco releases (and maybe others), do a taste test, and then evaluate whether the blend is probably at its peak now, whether it's something that needs age before it will blossom, or if maybe it's good now but would be great in 10 years. What I had in mind was a segment that would not only highlight the smoking characteristics of new blends but would also treat pipe tobacco releases like new vintage wine releases. It would give listeners tips for how to evaluate their own favorite blends -- both for now and for the years to come.
I certainly wasn't suggesting a show that would help me to determine whether I was in the mood to smoke something now or keep it in cellar!
Bob

Thanks, Brian!
I didn't mean to suggest that the burden of this had to fall exclusively on you. I guess I was under the assumption that you could have guests do featured segments. (Although now that I think of it, I can't recall that ever happening so far.)
As for #2: I don't see how blend-specific reviews would affect your relationship with advertisers in any way. All of the advertisers are either large resellers of tobaccos/pipes who have very long lists of what they carry, or else it's Missouri Meerschaum, which doesn't produce tobacco at all. I'm at a loss to see how saying, say, "Pease's new Navigator is just okay now, but I think it's going to be stellar in three years" would have anything to do with your advertisers. . . other than encouraging listeners to stock up and cellar. (I don't see how this differs from featuring McClelland on the show. . . or giving an extended overview of Orlik, both of which have been done.)
As for #3: The problem with this is that it doesn't help anyone become a more critical smoker and hone their abilities to appreciate tobacco to a deeper extent. If what you love is great, then why smoke anything else? Why learn about other blends and styles? If you're happy with grass clippings in a stone pipe, hurray! I don't think it's helpful to say that if you a love a blend then call it the best in the world and don't even think about it. This just means you're never going to be able to talk critically -- and I mean that in the full sense of the word -- about tobaccos on the show. Which of course may well be the direction you want to take.
As for the last paragraph: I always do appreciate hearing folks' favorite tobaccos in your Fast Five questions. But too many guests get off too easy. To the question of what is your favorite tobacco, I don't want to hear "a nice Virginia blend." I want to hear a name or several names. After all, if part of the function of the show is to sell advertisers' products, then I think some specifics would help.
Thank you for listening!
Bob