C&D Red Carpet

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
This is why tobacco reviews can be hilariously misleading and totally subjective.
The perfect blend of red Va.s and perique, pressed and sliced into flake form.
Notes: Part of the Simply Elegant Series
Per Jeremy Reeves, head blender at C&D:
"Somewhere along the way, older tins of Red Carpet ended up listing Izmir as a component in the description, but the original handwritten recipe, which we still have, does not contain Izmir. We discovered this during the C&D-Laudisi merger and printed new labels that exclude Izmir in the tin description. There is not now, nor should there ever have been, Izmir in Red Carpet."
The above statement is from Tobacco Reviews.com.
If you look at the majority of the reviews, most find a note of Izmir. I bought the tin with the assumption of Red Virginia and Izmir. The tin is dated 2014, finally decided to open it and read the description as Virginia/Perique on the back of the tin, and said "That's not Right."
Well it's a Vaper, it's a pretty decent smoke. Typical Vaper with tangy red Virginia, slightly earthy with a nice touch of spice from the perique. Medium Nicotine, no bite, and zero fuss.
How many of us are really duped by what's written on a tin and subjectively taken in with what we are smoking? Interesting. HUh.

 

papipeguy

Lifer
Jul 31, 2010
15,778
35
Bethlehem, Pa.
I guess the question really is how many for the blend descriptions come from the maker versus an editor at TR who imposes his/her description of the said blend? I like TR because at least it gives some idea of what's in a blend. Back in the '70's you had no idea unless your tobacconist told you.

Like anything else, a grain of salt should be noted.

 

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
I think "Syrian" could also come into play here. I've heard of blends marketed Syrian, yet some review a blend and say its not there, while others say it is.
I find the Red Carpet debacle entertaining,
+1 Grain of Salt.

 

aquadoc

Lifer
Feb 15, 2017
2,044
1,522
New Hampshire, USA
Interesting. Do you think that the last statement says that while there never should have been any, it might have been included? Or that there never was any included? Throws many reviewers into the "suspect" department.

 

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
I read it that Izmir was never used, then nor now. Seems to be a tin description error. Red Carpet kind of reminds me of Bijou, and it has Katerini, So go figure. The salt motif is a valid point.

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,190
562,042
I just got a sample last week in a trade. Now, I am more curious to try it. The friend (a fellow reviewer) who sent it to me described it as a VaPer, and he's a good reviewer.

 

aquadoc

Lifer
Feb 15, 2017
2,044
1,522
New Hampshire, USA
I look forward to your review. I follow 4 reviewers, yours being 1 of the 4, and 2 of the other 3 found Izmer to play a prominent role in the blend. I may have to rethink 2 of the folks I follow.

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,190
562,042
Well, the power of suggestion can be strong with some people. I'd give them another chance as you had trusted them before.

 
I remember when someone first told me that there was latakia in GLP's Laurel Heights, I swore by Ser Jacopo that it was a straight Virginia, because I didn't taste it (I was rather newish to pipes) and it wasn't on the label. But, Greg himself, came on here and told me that it was in the blend, just not on the label.

Then we have the Orlik Golden Slices thing, where they never listed any perique, and still I swear I don't taste it. But, without direct word from the company, we just sort of came to the consensus that we can believe that there is some perique in there, but if so, it is used so sparingly that it is not a true VaPer.
If Red Carpet has Izmir , then it would be almost exactly like Sunday Picnic, because they are rather close in flavors already, but Sunday Picnic has the Izmir. Both are rather good. The only versions of these that I've ever had was from digging them out of Skip's back closet at The Briary and came with almost 10-12 years on them. I'm not sure what they are like fresh.

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,190
562,042
I smoked a bowl before I went to bed, and I can see how somebody could be fooled into thinking Izmir is present, especially as it was in the description when the older reviews were written. Among the other flavor aspects, there's a little woody sourness I have in the past associated with Izmir that's very noticeable in every puff. Both the wood and sour/savory tartness come from the red Va., and that sour note is one we don't always encounter with dominant red Va. blends. It's a little less sweet than some red Va.s I have smoked, which could add to the idea Izmir is present. Going to try a wider bowl (I used a Canadian pre-Republic Pete for my first smoke) today and see if bowl size makes any difference.

 

aquadoc

Lifer
Feb 15, 2017
2,044
1,522
New Hampshire, USA
Interesting. I do not have the tobacco tasting acumen to discern the differences and this is the reason I have only reviewed a few blends, simple blends.

 

pappymac

Lifer
Feb 26, 2015
3,295
4,328
I'm a cynical retired journalist. I take almost everything I read on the internet with a grain of salt until I can verify it from different sources. (unlike modern day "journalist" who get secret messages written on gum wrappers and take it as truth".
The exception to this are reviews written by Jiminks and a few others on here and tobaccoreviews

 

aquadoc

Lifer
Feb 15, 2017
2,044
1,522
New Hampshire, USA
Yes, Jim's are quickly becoming the only reviews I read. And like you, my inborn cynic combined with my trained scientific approach to the world cynic, makes it difficult to take much at face value, especially in today's general fact resistant world view.

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,190
562,042
Just had my second bowl, and though the characteristics I mentioned earlier were still obvious, I thought it was slightly less sour in a wider bowl. I'm not certain if it's the pipe itself or the shape, so I'll try another pipe on my next bowl. Even still, I still can see how one might think Izmir might be there in a small way, especially if it's suggested on a tin. We'll see what a different pipe tells me.

 

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
Yea, Jim I've tried different size bowls, the Cob has been the best. I'm not familiar with Izmir enough, except a few Englishes I've had that boasted Izmir. Glad you jumped aboard, to grive me an experienced palate to help work through the flavors. The Virginia is typical C&D Red, to me. Could the Perique be adding any thing to the Izmir Placebo? I know that Katerini has reminded me of perique when smoking McClelland's Katerini Classic.

 

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
This is a great blend by the way, if not smoked slow, I feel you definitely miss the complexity. I seem to lose all flavor when smoked fast, actually. The perique is not in your face, just a slight spice that shows itself. Good stuff. Really, I couldn't recommend It more to the Vaper fan.

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,190
562,042
I'm half through my third bowl, and at this point, I think I'm right about what I have said earlier. This particular red Va. is not as sweet as say, McClelland 5100, Solani Silver Flake, or other reds of that genre. There are a number of ways to process red Virginia, which explains why some are sweeter, tangier than others. That difference of degree of sweetness in Red Carpet amplifies the wood and sour, tangy quality of this particular red to a small extent. As two major characteristics of Izmir are wood and dry, sourness, it's easy understand why some would think it is present in Red Carpet. Especially when they believed the old tin description.
I wouldn't be hard on the reviewers who made a mistake believing Izmir was a component. With all the different ways of processing tobacco varietals, and given that mixing different kinds of tobaccos together can often cause a shift in the flavors you might expect to encounter in a blend - not to mention variance of individual body chemistry - how one perceives what they taste will often vary.
Let me give another example while I am at it. When I originally reviewed Firestorm, I mentioned tasting cinnamon. The blend creator, Russ Ouellette, assured me there was no cinnamon added to the blend. I said I still taste it. Russ said he tasted it, too, even though he didn't add any cinnamon. Russ said things like that happen in processing and the marrying of tobaccos when a blend is created can cause unexpected chemical reactions.
Hope that clears up the mysteries.

 

perdurabo

Lifer
Jun 3, 2015
3,305
1,575
Specific Orientals are not defined, Deniz.
Thanks for your input, Jim. Totally put perspective into the conversation. Now for me to find a blend with a Huge Izmir note and get familiar.

 
I was always wondering if blenders even mention all ingridients contained?

I have smoked a few blends that certainly tasted like burley was in it, even thought the label suggested it was a straight Virginia. I am not going to split hairs with a company that claims that there is no burley in the blend; however, if there isn't any burley in the blend, then IMO the tobacconist just sucks at working with straight Virginias. And, I avoid the Virginias by that company.

I'm not sure why a company would hide something like that. It would seem to be lose/lose to claim to be a pure VA, leaving the smokers to think they just pick horrible tobaccos to use or screw them up.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.