Pipes Magazine » Pipe Tobacco Discussion

Search Forums  
   
Tags:   

Are Match Blends A Bonanza?

(6 posts)
  1. mso489

    mso489

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 25,967

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Does anyone have a sense if match blends of beloved discontinued blends are a bonanza or just an afterglow? With McCellands and Dunhill conspicuously retreating from the field, it seems like opportunity is wide open if some resemblance of flavor can be attained. I like PC Home and Hearth Mid-town series match of Walnut, called Chestnut, and there are many others that seem to do pretty well.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  2. trouttimes

    trouttimes

    Senior Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 1,043

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I like the 965 match. It is not 100% but close enough and as time goes by, I'll forget the original and think the match is real good.

    “The Road goes ever on and on Down from the door where it began.
    Now far ahead the Road has gone, I must follow if I can
    Posted 1 month ago #
  3. sasquatch

    sasquatch

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 960

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    On one hand, anyone able to produce Frog Morton right now could retire wealthy, apparently.

    But really, on the other hand, what we have are piles of excellent blends still available in basically every genre, and while if you seek some specific experience, eg that particular sootiness in London Mixture, you won't find it in the matches and they'll disappoint, perhaps. But taking most tobaccos for what they are rather than what they aren't leads a guy to all sorts of enjoyment.

    And exploring weird stuff no one's heard of like the Aylesbury blends... is fun.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  4. sablebrush52

    sablebrush52

    The Bard Of Barlings
    Joined: Jun 2013
    Posts: 9,650

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I think it depends upon what is being matched. The Mid Town series are really good, as are the Edgeworth RR and Elizabethan matches. But matching a McClelland blend is impossible for a number of reasons, as is matching Germain's, or Gawith.

    It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

    It is pointless to argue with a fanatic since a dim bulb can't be converted into a searchlight. - Jesse Silver
    Posted 1 month ago #
  5. dcon

    dcon

    Member
    Joined: Mar 2019
    Posts: 541

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I agree with trouttimes and will state that, I believe that the 965 Match (now Match 20) and the Elizabethan Match (now Victorian) are superior to the STG versions and are very much like the old Murray’s. I like them a lot. I, also, agree with sablebrush that, some things are inimitable. The cost, the dedication, and the lack of product sourcing make it so.

    Duane
    (Not Embers)
    Posted 1 month ago #
  6. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 32,168

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The Dunhill match blends on the market now are all based on the Murray's versions. I've reviewed quite a number of match blends and posted them on this forum: http://pipesmagazine.com/forums/topic/jims-sutliff-match-reviews

    I have updated and partially rewritten some since then at TR.com, but this thread may be of help to anyone interested in match blends.

    Posted 1 month ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.

 

banner

 

    Back To Top  | Back to Forum Home Page

   Members Online Now
   chasingembers, craig61a, loneredtree, alaskanpiper, jpmcwjr, josephcross, ben88, danimalia, thefishguy, ashdigger, loadclear, lochinvar, donjgiles, mikefu