1955 Dunhill Shell (Shape LB)

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

georged

Lifer
Mar 7, 2013
5,534
14,200
Sandblasting is a surprisingly delicate business. Too much and the stummel's shape changes unacceptably. Too little, and one of the reasons for blasting---dramatic visual effect---is diminished.
(Factoid for non-pipemakers: The "ridge depth" almost exclusively depends on the wood itself... blasting longer or harder doesn't achieve it.)
A good balance of "cragginess" while retaining a stummel's lines is almost always the goal.
This LB is an excellent example of good balance. Good blast depth and coverage while the shape remains razor sharp. Visual-mass-wise it's also notable for an LB---a shape that frequently wanders into chunky territory and can look bloated. This one spent some time in the gym. 8)
P1010861_2.jpg


P1010870.jpg


P1010860.jpg


P1010856.jpg


P1010877.jpg


 

ssjones

Moderator
Staff member
May 11, 2011
18,410
11,302
Maryland
postimg.cc
Very nice.
I always struggle to differentiate a '55 from a '65. It's the size of the year suffix, right that determines that period, right?

 

dmcmtk

Lifer
Aug 23, 2013
3,672
1,685
I always struggle to differentiate a '55 from a '65. It's the size of the year suffix, right that determines that period, right?
Yes.
That's a classic George!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.