Afternoon gang,
I've perused quite a few different threads over the last year celebrating some tobacco reviews, and lambasting others. I have seen review(er)s criticized for being too long-winded & too abrupt, for over romanticizing a tobacco & for being boring. I enjoyed Greg Pease's article http://luxurytobaccoreviews.com/reviews-without-tears.php . This all said, I wonder what your ideal tobacco review looks like. I imagine this is different for everyone, but I thought it might be fun to see what is interesting to others. So... What do you like in a tobacco review?
-- Pat
I've perused quite a few different threads over the last year celebrating some tobacco reviews, and lambasting others. I have seen review(er)s criticized for being too long-winded & too abrupt, for over romanticizing a tobacco & for being boring. I enjoyed Greg Pease's article http://luxurytobaccoreviews.com/reviews-without-tears.php . This all said, I wonder what your ideal tobacco review looks like. I imagine this is different for everyone, but I thought it might be fun to see what is interesting to others. So... What do you like in a tobacco review?
-- Pat