The New Peterson (Old Dunhill) Tobaccos Deleted from the Dunhill Tobaccoreviews Folder?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
61,252
563,385
Fair enough. In the case that the products are more or less identical, it would help to have naming aliases in the other groupings that all point back to a single entry. This would at least help other people find it if they have an old/differently labeled tin. Also, it may be helpful to have a "version" or "edition" field so that people that want to track the specific one rated could do so and it would be something searchable/sortable outside of just typing it into the review text. Regardless, thank you for the helpful information on the pedigree of these particular blends. Definitely an interesting history!

It'd be impossible because you'd have to go through thousands of entries and try to sort it all out. You can't ask the reviewers who originally posted them because there's likely no contact info for them, and who knows how many of them no longer have accounts.
 

kschatey

Lifer
Oct 16, 2019
1,118
2,272
Ohio
It'd be impossible because you'd have to go through thousands of entries and try to sort it all out. You can't ask the reviewers who originally posted them because there's likely no contact info for them, and who knows how many of them no longer have accounts.
I don't disagree. I just thing adding version/edition going forward might be a nice to have kind of thing, but definitely not required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimInks
Status
Not open for further replies.